PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWO vs. IVOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWO vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 20.92% return, which is significantly higher than IVOO's 15.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWO having a 10.77% annualized return and IVOO not far ahead at 10.93%.


VTWO

1D
1.69%
1M
-0.42%
6M
13.61%
YTD
20.92%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
10.77%
ALL TIME*
11.43%

IVOO

1D
1.15%
1M
0.12%
6M
10.44%
YTD
15.90%
1Y
24.27%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
10.93%
ALL TIME*
12.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.81M$9.39M$9.90M
$175.64M$193.82M$227.97M

VTWO vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
20.92%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%14.69%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
15.90%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%16.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWO and IVOO is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.94

The correlation between VTWO and IVOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWO vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWO
IVOO

Healthcare

20.2%
8.9%

Financial Services

17.6%
13.8%

Technology

14.8%
17.4%

Industrials

14.1%
25.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
10.5%

Real Estate

6.7%
7.2%

Energy

5.4%
4.6%

Basic Materials

4.4%
4.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.2%

Communication Services

2.2%
1.5%

Healthcare

VTWO
20.2%
IVOO
8.9%

Financial Services

VTWO
17.6%
IVOO
13.8%

Technology

VTWO
14.8%
IVOO
17.4%

Industrials

VTWO
14.1%
IVOO
25.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWO
9.2%
IVOO
10.5%

Real Estate

VTWO
6.7%
IVOO
7.2%

Energy

VTWO
5.4%
IVOO
4.6%

Basic Materials

VTWO
4.4%
IVOO
4.8%

Utilities

VTWO
2.7%
IVOO
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

VTWO
2.6%
IVOO
3.2%

Communication Services

VTWO
2.2%
IVOO
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWO vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTWO vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWOIVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.28

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

2.77

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.83

10.07

+2.76

VTWO vs. IVOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the IVOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWO and IVOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWO vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, roughly equal to the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and IVOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWOIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.19%

-42.33%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-8.81%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-24.22%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-24.22%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

-42.33%

+1.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-1.20%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-5.23%

-3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.42%

+0.67%

Volatility

VTWO vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) at 3.61%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWOIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.61%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

11.64%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

15.68%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

19.66%

+2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.07%

21.16%

+1.91%

VTWO vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IVOO's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWO vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison

VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than IVOO's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.17%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.09%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VTWO and IVOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWO has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to IVOO (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs IVOO's -42.33%.

On 10-year performance, IVOO leads with 10.93% vs 10.77% for VTWO. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IVOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVOO has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 10.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IVOO.

IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 1.09% for VTWO.

VTWO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IVOO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWO and 0.07% for IVOO.

VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWO and IVOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer