PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWO vs. IVOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWO vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than IVOO's 14.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWO having a 11.07% annualized return and IVOO not far ahead at 11.22%.


VTWO

1D
-1.38%
1M
3.51%
YTD
17.08%
6M
15.89%
1Y
39.34%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
11.07%

IVOO

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.90%
YTD
14.13%
6M
14.37%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWO vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
17.08%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%14.69%
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
14.13%7.47%13.77%16.45%-13.17%24.61%13.61%26.18%-11.33%16.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWO and IVOO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.94

The correlation between VTWO and IVOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWO vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWO
IVOO

Industrials

17.7%
25.1%

Technology

17.0%
15.7%

Healthcare

16.5%
8.6%

Financial Services

15.7%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
10.7%

Real Estate

6.1%
7.5%

Energy

6.1%
5.5%

Basic Materials

4.8%
4.8%

Utilities

2.9%
3.1%

Communication Services

2.4%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
3.8%

Industrials

VTWO
17.7%
IVOO
25.1%

Technology

VTWO
17.0%
IVOO
15.7%

Healthcare

VTWO
16.5%
IVOO
8.6%

Financial Services

VTWO
15.7%
IVOO
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWO
8.4%
IVOO
10.7%

Real Estate

VTWO
6.1%
IVOO
7.5%

Energy

VTWO
6.1%
IVOO
5.5%

Basic Materials

VTWO
4.8%
IVOO
4.8%

Utilities

VTWO
2.9%
IVOO
3.1%

Communication Services

VTWO
2.4%
IVOO
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

VTWO
2.4%
IVOO
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWO vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOO
IVOO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IVOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWO vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTWOIVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

1.65

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

2.41

+0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

2.91

+0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.79

10.61

+2.18

VTWO vs. IVOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the IVOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWO and IVOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTWOIVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.65

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.42

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.53

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.62

-0.10

Drawdowns

VTWO vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, roughly equal to the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and IVOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWOIVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.19%

-42.33%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-8.81%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-24.22%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-24.22%

-7.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

-42.33%

+1.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-0.02%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-5.27%

-3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.41%

+0.67%

Volatility

VTWO vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) at 4.39%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWOIVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

4.39%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.50%

11.36%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.12%

15.56%

+3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.48%

19.72%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

21.19%

+1.89%

VTWO vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VTWO and IVOO have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWO vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison

VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than IVOO's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOO
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
1.19%1.35%1.30%1.25%1.58%1.14%1.23%1.49%1.56%1.22%1.37%1.45%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.08%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VTWO and IVOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to IVOO (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs IVOO's -42.33%.

On 10-year performance, IVOO leads with 11.22% vs 11.07% for VTWO. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IVOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVOO has performed better with a 11.22% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWO and IVOO have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.08% for VTWO.

VTWO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IVOO is Small Cap Growth Equities. VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index.

VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWO and IVOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer