VTWG vs. CAFG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VTWG (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF) and CAFG (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - VTWG tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index while CAFG tracks the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VTWG returned 18.23%/yr vs 14.49%/yr for CAFG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CAFG.

Performance

VTWG vs. CAFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWG achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly lower than CAFG's 25.78% return.

VTWG

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 4.49%
• YTD: 16.90%
• 6M: 15.29%
• 1Y: 37.62%
• 3Y*: 18.23%
• 5Y*: 5.70%
• 10Y*: 11.33%

CAFG

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 4.31%
• YTD: 25.78%
• 6M: 24.70%
• 1Y: 31.67%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWG vs. CAFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF	16.90%	13.07%	15.15%	15.10%
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	25.78%	0.17%	6.95%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWG and CAFG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023	0.88

The correlation between VTWG and CAFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWG vs. CAFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VTWG	CAFG
Technology	23.5%	30.8%
Industrials	23.1%	19.3%
Healthcare	22.4%	18.8%
Financial Services	8.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	7.2%
Basic Materials	4.2%	2.4%
Energy	3.5%	13.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	3.0%
Communication Services	2.2%	3.7%
Real Estate	2.1%	-
Utilities	0.7%	1.4%

Return for Risk

VTWG vs. CAFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWG

VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 49
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

CAFG

CAFG Risk / Return Rank: 61
CAFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
CAFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CAFG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CAFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CAFG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWG vs. CAFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VTWG	CAFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.83	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.63	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.31	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	3.91	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.16	12.74	-3.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VTWG vs. CAFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWG Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the CAFG Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWG and CAFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VTWG	CAFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	1.83	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.87	-0.35

Drawdowns

VTWG vs. CAFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, which is greater than CAFG's maximum drawdown of -23.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and CAFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTWG	CAFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.07%	-23.66%	-18.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	-8.13%	-6.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.58%	-23.66%	-4.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.39%	-0.38%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.53%	-5.53%	-5.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	2.49%	+1.63%

Volatility

VTWG vs. CAFG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) at 5.20%. This indicates that VTWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTWG	CAFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.62%	5.20%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.90%	12.75%	+3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.50%	17.40%	+4.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.52%	19.58%	+4.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.21%	19.58%	+4.63%

VTWG vs. CAFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CAFG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

VTWG vs. CAFG - Dividend Comparison

VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than CAFG's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.27%	0.35%	0.36%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF	0.59%	0.64%	0.55%	0.79%	0.71%	0.54%	0.48%	0.72%	0.72%	0.64%	0.96%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTWG and CAFG in my portfolio?

VTWG and CAFG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VTWG or CAFG?

VTWG has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to CAFG (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWG dropped -42.07% vs CAFG's -23.66%.

Which ETF is better, VTWG or CAFG?

On 3-year performance, VTWG leads with 18.23% vs 14.49% for CAFG. On fees, VTWG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CAFG has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VTWG or CAFG?

Over the 3-year period, VTWG has performed better with a 18.23% return vs 14.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VTWG or CAFG?

VTWG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CAFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VTWG or CAFG?

VTWG has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.27% for CAFG.

What is the main difference between VTWG and CAFG?

VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while CAFG tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VTWG and 0.59% for CAFG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.