PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWG vs. VTWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWG vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTWG having a 20.68% return and VTWV slightly higher at 21.33%. Over the past 10 years, VTWG has outperformed VTWV with an annualized return of 12.14%, while VTWV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.92% annualized return.


VTWG

1D
0.21%
1M
4.58%
YTD
20.68%
6M
16.99%
1Y
38.16%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
12.14%

VTWV

1D
0.38%
1M
3.80%
YTD
21.33%
6M
18.75%
1Y
42.06%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
10.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWG vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
20.68%13.07%15.15%18.90%-26.49%2.84%34.72%28.75%-9.45%22.27%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
21.33%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWG and VTWV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.84

The correlation between VTWG and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWG vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWG
VTWV

Technology

25.8%
11.6%

Industrials

23.1%
12.2%

Healthcare

22.0%
10.1%

Financial Services

7.8%
24.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
8.9%

Basic Materials

4.0%
5.4%

Energy

3.1%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
2.1%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
10.2%

Utilities

0.6%
5.0%

Technology

VTWG
25.8%
VTWV
11.6%

Industrials

VTWG
23.1%
VTWV
12.2%

Healthcare

VTWG
22.0%
VTWV
10.1%

Financial Services

VTWG
7.8%
VTWV
24.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWG
7.1%
VTWV
8.9%

Basic Materials

VTWG
4.0%
VTWV
5.4%

Energy

VTWG
3.1%
VTWV
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

VTWG
2.3%
VTWV
2.1%

Communication Services

VTWG
2.2%
VTWV
2.7%

Real Estate

VTWG
2.0%
VTWV
10.2%

Utilities

VTWG
0.6%
VTWV
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWG vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWG
VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWG vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWGVTWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

4.89

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.25

16.72

-7.47

VTWG vs. VTWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWG Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the VTWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWG and VTWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWG vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum VTWV drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and VTWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWGVTWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-45.73%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-8.64%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.58%

-26.72%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-26.72%

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-45.73%

+3.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

0.00%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-7.79%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

2.52%

+1.62%

Volatility

VTWG vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a higher volatility of 7.76% compared to Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) at 5.32%. This indicates that VTWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWGVTWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

5.32%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.86%

12.61%

+4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.32%

18.38%

+3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

21.71%

+2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

23.54%

+0.73%

VTWG vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWG vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison

VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than VTWV's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.59%0.64%0.55%0.79%0.71%0.54%0.48%0.72%0.72%0.64%0.96%0.72%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.63%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWG and VTWV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTWG has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to VTWV (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWG dropped -42.07% vs VTWV's -45.73%.

On 10-year performance, VTWG leads with 12.14% vs 10.92% for VTWV. On fees, VTWG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VTWV has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWG has performed better with a 12.14% return vs 10.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.

VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.59% for VTWG.

VTWG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VTWV is Small Cap Value Equities. VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWG and 0.10% for VTWV.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWG and VTWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer