PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWG vs. VIOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWG vs. VIOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTWG having a 20.43% return and VIOG slightly higher at 21.22%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWG having a 12.12% annualized return and VIOG not far behind at 11.67%.


VTWG

1D
-1.45%
1M
4.36%
YTD
20.43%
6M
16.97%
1Y
40.10%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
12.12%

VIOG

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.48%
YTD
21.22%
6M
17.74%
1Y
31.94%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
6.20%
10Y*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWG vs. VIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
20.43%13.07%15.15%18.90%-26.49%2.84%34.72%28.75%-9.45%22.27%
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
21.22%5.40%9.23%16.92%-21.14%22.49%19.68%21.16%-4.57%14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWG and VIOG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.91

The correlation between VTWG and VIOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWG vs. VIOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWG
VIOG

Technology

25.8%
19.7%

Industrials

23.1%
19.5%

Healthcare

22.0%
14.6%

Financial Services

7.8%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
10.9%

Basic Materials

4.0%
3.1%

Energy

3.1%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
6.6%

Utilities

0.6%
1.7%

Technology

VTWG
25.8%
VIOG
19.7%

Industrials

VTWG
23.1%
VIOG
19.5%

Healthcare

VTWG
22.0%
VIOG
14.6%

Financial Services

VTWG
7.8%
VIOG
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWG
7.1%
VIOG
10.9%

Basic Materials

VTWG
4.0%
VIOG
3.1%

Energy

VTWG
3.1%
VIOG
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

VTWG
2.3%
VIOG
3.3%

Communication Services

VTWG
2.2%
VIOG
2.7%

Real Estate

VTWG
2.0%
VIOG
6.6%

Utilities

VTWG
0.6%
VIOG
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWG vs. VIOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWG
VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWG vs. VIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWGVIOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.55

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.72

12.24

-2.53

VTWG vs. VIOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWG Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the VIOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWG and VIOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWG vs. VIOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, roughly equal to the maximum VIOG drawdown of -41.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and VIOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWGVIOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-41.73%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-9.03%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.58%

-27.35%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-29.15%

-11.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-41.73%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-0.43%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-7.60%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

2.62%

+1.52%

Volatility

VTWG vs. VIOG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) at 5.47%. This indicates that VTWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWGVIOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

5.47%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

13.02%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.34%

17.92%

+4.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

21.53%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

22.86%

+1.41%

VTWG vs. VIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VIOG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWG vs. VIOG - Dividend Comparison

VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than VIOG's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.80%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.59%0.64%0.55%0.79%0.71%0.54%0.48%0.72%0.72%0.64%0.96%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VTWG and VIOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWG has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to VIOG (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWG dropped -42.07% vs VIOG's -41.73%.

On 10-year performance, VTWG leads with 12.12% vs 11.67% for VIOG. On fees, VTWG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VIOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWG has performed better with a 12.12% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VIOG.

VIOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.59% for VTWG.

VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWG and 0.15% for VIOG.

VTWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWG and VIOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer