VTI vs. GLTR
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 15.02%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for GLTR. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.
Performance
VTI vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -4.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 15.02%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.08% annualized return.
VTI
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 26.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -9.08%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
VTI vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.62% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -4.66% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and GLTR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2010 | 0.16 |
The correlation between VTI and GLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
GLTR
VTI vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTI | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.22 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 1.17 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 2.88 | +9.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTI vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, roughly equal to the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and GLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -55.70% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -34.09% | +25.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -34.09% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -34.09% | +8.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -34.09% | -0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -31.27% | +29.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -28.82% | +20.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 13.86% | -11.87% |
Volatility
VTI vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 4.50%, while abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 10.43% | -5.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 36.24% | -26.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 38.40% | -25.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 23.87% | -6.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 20.64% | -2.31% |
VTI vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTI vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and GLTR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLTR has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to VTI (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs GLTR's -55.70%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.02% vs 12.08% for GLTR. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.02% return vs 12.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.
VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while GLTR is Precious Metals. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.60% for GLTR.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTI and GLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer