PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTHR vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTHR vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTHR achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, VTHR has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 14.55%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.71% annualized return.


VTHR

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.19%
6M
8.65%
YTD
10.36%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
18.81%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
14.55%
ALL TIME*
14.17%

VYM

1D
0.00%
1M
1.56%
6M
9.31%
YTD
14.21%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
11.71%
ALL TIME*
9.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.26M$9.46M$10.85M
$195.34M$198.02M$200.78M

VTHR vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
10.36%16.99%23.57%25.92%-19.20%25.49%20.93%30.82%-5.65%21.06%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
14.21%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHR and VYM is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.83

The correlation between VTHR and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTHR vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTHR
VYM

Technology

35.7%
17.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
21.0%

Industrials

10.0%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
6.8%

Healthcare

9.6%
13.2%

Communication Services

9.3%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
8.1%

Energy

3.2%
8.6%

Real Estate

2.3%
0.0%

Utilities

2.2%
5.7%

Basic Materials

2.0%
3.3%

Technology

VTHR
35.7%
VYM
17.8%

Financial Services

VTHR
11.9%
VYM
21.0%

Industrials

VTHR
10.0%
VYM
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VTHR
9.6%
VYM
6.8%

Healthcare

VTHR
9.6%
VYM
13.2%

Communication Services

VTHR
9.3%
VYM
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

VTHR
4.3%
VYM
8.1%

Energy

VTHR
3.2%
VYM
8.6%

Real Estate

VTHR
2.3%
VYM
0.0%

Utilities

VTHR
2.2%
VYM
5.7%

Basic Materials

VTHR
2.0%
VYM
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTHR vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTHR
VTHR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VTHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTHR vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTHRVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.56

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.57

13.40

-3.83

VTHR vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHR and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTHR vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTHRVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.61%

-56.98%

+22.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-6.69%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-14.46%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

-15.84%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.61%

-35.21%

+0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.15%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-7.14%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.78%

+0.28%

Volatility

VTHR vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.46%. This indicates that VTHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTHRVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

2.46%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

7.42%

+2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

10.29%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

13.87%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

16.29%

+1.55%

VTHR vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTHR vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than VYM's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
1.03%1.08%1.19%1.47%1.52%1.16%1.37%1.65%1.89%1.63%1.82%1.84%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.24%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTHR and VYM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTHR has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to VYM (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VTHR leads with 14.55% vs 11.71% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTHR has performed better with a 14.55% return vs 11.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VTHR.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.03% for VTHR.

VTHR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VTHR tracks Russell 3000 Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTHR and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTHR and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer