VTHR vs. VTWO
VTHR (Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF) and VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTHR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Index, while VTWO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTHR returned 14.95%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for VTWO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTHR charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VTWO.
Performance
VTHR vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTHR achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly lower than VTWO's 17.08% return. Over the past 10 years, VTHR has outperformed VTWO with an annualized return of 14.95%, while VTWO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.07% annualized return.
VTHR
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 10.94%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 27.71%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
VTWO
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 39.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
VTHR vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 10.94% | 16.99% | 23.57% | 25.92% | -19.20% | 25.49% | 20.93% | 30.82% | -5.65% | 21.06% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 17.08% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 14.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTHR and VTWO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VTHR and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTHR vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTHR
VTWO
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
VTHR
VTWO
Financial Services
VTHR
VTWO
Communication Services
VTHR
VTWO
Consumer Cyclical
VTHR
VTWO
Industrials
VTHR
VTWO
Healthcare
VTHR
VTWO
Consumer Defensive
VTHR
VTWO
Energy
VTHR
VTWO
Real Estate
VTHR
VTWO
Utilities
VTHR
VTWO
Basic Materials
VTHR
VTWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTHR vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank
VTHR
VTWO
VTHR vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTHR | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 3.60 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.34 | 12.79 | +1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTHR | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.07 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.28 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.48 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.52 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
VTHR vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, smaller than the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and VTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTHR | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.61% | -41.19% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -10.99% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | -27.57% | +8.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -31.88% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.61% | -41.19% | +6.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -1.50% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -8.39% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 3.08% | -1.14% |
Volatility
VTHR vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) is 2.98%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that VTHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTHR | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 5.73% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 13.50% | -4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 19.12% | -6.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 22.48% | -5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 23.08% | -5.24% |
VTHR vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTHR has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWO's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTHR vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison
VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than VTWO's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 1.00% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.16% | 1.37% | 1.65% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.84% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.08% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTHR and VTWO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to VTHR (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs VTWO's -41.19%.
On 10-year performance, VTHR leads with 14.95% vs 11.07% for VTWO. On fees, VTHR is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VTHR has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTHR has performed better with a 14.95% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTHR is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWO.
VTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 1.00% for VTHR.
VTHR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VTWO is Small Cap Blend Equities. VTHR tracks Russell 3000 Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VTHR and 0.10% for VTWO.
VTHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTHR and VTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer