PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSS vs. GLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSS vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -3.01% return. Over the past 10 years, VSS has underperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 7.98%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.


VSS

1D
0.02%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
7.74%
6M
10.30%
1Y
22.83%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
7.98%

GLTR

1D
0.02%
1M
-11.67%
YTD
-3.01%
6M
6.38%
1Y
45.14%
3Y*
30.24%
5Y*
14.39%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSS vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
7.74%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%
GLTR
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF
-3.01%87.25%20.63%2.01%-0.25%-9.60%29.52%20.96%-2.85%12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and GLTR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2010

0.36

The correlation between VSS and GLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSS vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

GLTR
GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSS vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSSGLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.51

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

3.41

+4.12

VSS vs. GLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the GLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and GLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSSGLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.19

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.61

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.60

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.31

+0.23

Drawdowns

VSS vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and GLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSSGLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-55.70%

+12.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-30.10%

+18.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-30.10%

+14.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-30.10%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-30.10%

-13.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-30.08%

+25.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-28.83%

+19.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

13.25%

-10.21%

Volatility

VSS vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) is 5.87%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that VSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSSGLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

9.50%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

35.83%

-22.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

38.04%

-22.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

23.75%

-7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

20.57%

-3.27%

VSS vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSS vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLTR
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.15%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSS and GLTR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLTR has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to VSS (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs GLTR's -55.70%.

On 10-year performance, GLTR leads with 12.31% vs 7.98% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VSS has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLTR has performed better with a 12.31% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.

VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.

VSS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while GLTR is Precious Metals. VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.60% for GLTR.

VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSS and GLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer