VSS vs. GLTR
VSS (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF) and GLTR (Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VSS returned 7.98%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for GLTR. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VSS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.
Performance
VSS vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -3.01% return. Over the past 10 years, VSS has underperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 7.98%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.
VSS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 22.83%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 5.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -11.67%
- YTD
- -3.01%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 45.14%
- 3Y*
- 30.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
VSS vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 7.74% | 29.61% | 2.94% | 15.52% | -21.48% | 13.05% | 11.81% | 21.36% | -18.48% | 30.61% |
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -3.01% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSS and GLTR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2010 | 0.36 |
The correlation between VSS and GLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSS vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
VSS
GLTR
VSS vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSS | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.51 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 3.41 | +4.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSS | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.19 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.61 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.60 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.31 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
VSS vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and GLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSS | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -55.70% | +12.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -30.10% | +18.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.73% | -30.10% | +14.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.93% | -30.10% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.51% | -30.10% | -13.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.08% | -30.08% | +25.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -28.83% | +19.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 13.25% | -10.21% |
Volatility
VSS vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) is 5.87%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that VSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSS | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 9.50% | -3.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.18% | 35.83% | -22.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 38.04% | -22.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 23.75% | -7.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 20.57% | -3.27% |
VSS vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSS vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 3.15% | 3.39% | 3.44% | 3.14% | 2.30% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 3.25% | 2.80% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSS and GLTR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLTR has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to VSS (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs GLTR's -55.70%.
On 10-year performance, GLTR leads with 12.31% vs 7.98% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VSS has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLTR has performed better with a 12.31% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.
VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.
VSS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while GLTR is Precious Metals. VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.60% for GLTR.
VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSS and GLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer