PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSS vs. SCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSS vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than SCZ's 9.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSS having a 8.76% annualized return and SCZ not far ahead at 8.92%.


VSS

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
10.76%
6M
11.06%
1Y
26.93%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
8.76%

SCZ

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
9.50%
6M
9.97%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
5.65%
10Y*
8.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSS vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
10.76%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
9.50%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and SCZ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2009

0.94

The correlation between VSS and SCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSS vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSS
SCZ

Industrials

18.7%
24.2%

Technology

14.5%
10.8%

Basic Materials

12.2%
10.2%

Financial Services

10.1%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
12.3%

Real Estate

7.1%
9.9%

Healthcare

6.0%
5.9%

Energy

4.4%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.7%

Utilities

2.5%
2.2%

Communication Services

2.3%
3.8%

Industrials

VSS
18.7%
SCZ
24.2%

Technology

VSS
14.5%
SCZ
10.8%

Basic Materials

VSS
12.2%
SCZ
10.2%

Financial Services

VSS
10.1%
SCZ
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VSS
9.1%
SCZ
12.3%

Real Estate

VSS
7.1%
SCZ
9.9%

Healthcare

VSS
6.0%
SCZ
5.9%

Energy

VSS
4.4%
SCZ
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

VSS
3.5%
SCZ
4.7%

Utilities

VSS
2.5%
SCZ
2.2%

Communication Services

VSS
2.3%
SCZ
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSS vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSS vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSSSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.14

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.70

8.07

+0.63

VSS vs. SCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the SCZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and SCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSS vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and SCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSSSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-61.86%

+18.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-11.43%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-15.06%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-36.87%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-41.07%

-2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-1.84%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-13.03%

+3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

3.02%

+0.08%

Volatility

VSS vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) at 4.73%. This indicates that VSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSSSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

4.73%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.61%

12.53%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

14.89%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

16.79%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

17.40%

-0.12%

VSS vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSS vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than SCZ's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.19%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.15%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VSS and SCZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSS has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to SCZ (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs SCZ's -61.86%.

On 10-year performance, SCZ leads with 8.92% vs 8.76% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCZ has performed better with a 8.92% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.

SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 3.15% for VSS.

VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.40% for SCZ.

VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSS and SCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer