VSS vs. SCZ
VSS (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF) and SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds - VSS tracks the FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index while SCZ tracks the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VSS returned 8.76%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for SCZ. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCZ.
Performance
VSS vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than SCZ's 9.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSS having a 8.76% annualized return and SCZ not far ahead at 8.92%.
VSS
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 26.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
SCZ
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 9.50%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 5.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
VSS vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 10.76% | 29.61% | 2.94% | 15.52% | -21.48% | 13.05% | 11.81% | 21.36% | -18.48% | 30.61% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.50% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSS and SCZ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2009 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VSS and SCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
VSS vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSS
SCZ
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
VSS
SCZ
Technology
VSS
SCZ
Basic Materials
VSS
SCZ
Financial Services
VSS
SCZ
Consumer Cyclical
VSS
SCZ
Real Estate
VSS
SCZ
Healthcare
VSS
SCZ
Energy
VSS
SCZ
Consumer Defensive
VSS
SCZ
Utilities
VSS
SCZ
Communication Services
VSS
SCZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSS vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank
VSS
SCZ
VSS vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSS | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.14 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | 8.07 | +0.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSS vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and SCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSS | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -61.86% | +18.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -11.43% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.73% | -15.06% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.93% | -36.87% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.51% | -41.07% | -2.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.41% | -1.84% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.62% | -13.03% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 3.02% | +0.08% |
Volatility
VSS vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) at 4.73%. This indicates that VSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSS | SCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 4.73% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 12.53% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 14.89% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 16.79% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 17.40% | -0.12% |
VSS vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSS vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison
VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than SCZ's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.19% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 3.15% | 3.39% | 3.44% | 3.14% | 2.30% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 3.25% | 2.80% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, VSS and SCZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VSS has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to SCZ (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs SCZ's -61.86%.
On 10-year performance, SCZ leads with 8.92% vs 8.76% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCZ has performed better with a 8.92% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SCZ.
SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 3.15% for VSS.
VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.40% for SCZ.
VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSS and SCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer