VSS vs. SCHC
VSS (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds - VSS tracks the FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index while SCHC tracks the FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VSS returned 7.53%/yr vs 7.79%/yr for SCHC. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. VSS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
VSS vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than SCHC's 6.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSS having a 7.53% annualized return and SCHC not far ahead at 7.79%.
VSS
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- 16.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.20%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.62%
SCHC
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 1Y
- 18.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.36M | $16.20M | $17.01M | |
| $26.20M | $30.06M | $40.76M |
VSS vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 5.59% | 29.61% | 2.94% | 15.52% | -21.48% | 13.05% | 11.81% | 21.36% | -18.48% | 30.61% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 6.41% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 23.10% | -18.60% | 29.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSS and SCHC is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010 | 0.96 |
The correlation between VSS and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VSS vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSS
SCHC
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
VSS
SCHC
Technology
VSS
SCHC
Basic Materials
VSS
SCHC
Financial Services
VSS
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
VSS
SCHC
Real Estate
VSS
SCHC
Healthcare
VSS
SCHC
Energy
VSS
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
VSS
SCHC
Utilities
VSS
SCHC
Communication Services
VSS
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSS vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
VSS
SCHC
VSS vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSS | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.54 | 4.54 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSS vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSS | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -43.94% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -12.48% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.73% | -13.85% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.93% | -36.48% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.51% | -43.94% | +0.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -6.00% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.60% | -10.01% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 4.02% | -0.37% |
Volatility
VSS vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) at 4.78%. This indicates that VSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSS | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 4.78% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.40% | 14.46% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.22% | 16.55% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 17.65% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 17.82% | -0.68% |
VSS vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHC's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VSS vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than SCHC's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.48% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 3.31% | 3.39% | 3.44% | 3.14% | 2.30% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 3.25% | 2.80% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, VSS and SCHC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VSS has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to SCHC (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 10-year performance, SCHC leads with 7.79% vs 7.53% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHC has performed better with a 7.79% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for SCHC.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 3.31% for VSS.
VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.08% for SCHC.
SCHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSS and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer