PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSS vs. SCHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSS vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than SCHC's 6.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSS having a 7.53% annualized return and SCHC not far ahead at 7.79%.


VSS

1D
-0.16%
1M
-2.96%
6M
-0.76%
YTD
5.59%
1Y
16.61%
3Y*
13.20%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
7.53%
ALL TIME*
9.62%

SCHC

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.43%
6M
-0.74%
YTD
6.41%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
5.74%
10Y*
7.79%
ALL TIME*
7.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.36M$16.20M$17.01M
$26.20M$30.06M$40.76M

VSS vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
5.59%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
6.41%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and SCHC is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010

0.96

The correlation between VSS and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSS vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSS
SCHC

Industrials

20.5%
20.4%

Technology

15.7%
8.1%

Basic Materials

12.9%
13.3%

Financial Services

12.3%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.3%

Real Estate

7.9%
6.2%

Healthcare

6.1%
5.0%

Energy

4.6%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
3.9%

Utilities

2.5%
2.8%

Communication Services

2.1%
2.6%

Industrials

VSS
20.5%
SCHC
20.4%

Technology

VSS
15.7%
SCHC
8.1%

Basic Materials

VSS
12.9%
SCHC
13.3%

Financial Services

VSS
12.3%
SCHC
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VSS
9.0%
SCHC
9.3%

Real Estate

VSS
7.9%
SCHC
6.2%

Healthcare

VSS
6.1%
SCHC
5.0%

Energy

VSS
4.6%
SCHC
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

VSS
3.5%
SCHC
3.9%

Utilities

VSS
2.5%
SCHC
2.8%

Communication Services

VSS
2.1%
SCHC
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSS vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VSS vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSSSCHCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

1.46

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.54

4.54

0.00

VSS vs. SCHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the SCHC Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and SCHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSS vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and SCHC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSSSCHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-43.94%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-12.48%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-13.85%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-36.48%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-43.94%

+0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.97%

-6.00%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.60%

-10.01%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

4.02%

-0.37%

Volatility

VSS vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) at 4.78%. This indicates that VSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSSSCHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

4.78%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.40%

14.46%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.22%

16.55%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

17.65%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

17.82%

-0.68%

VSS vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHC's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSS vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than SCHC's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.48%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.31%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, VSS and SCHC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSS has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to SCHC (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs SCHC's -43.94%.

On 10-year performance, SCHC leads with 7.79% vs 7.53% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHC has performed better with a 7.79% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for SCHC.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 3.31% for VSS.

VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while SCHC tracks FTSE Developed Small Cap ex U.S. Liquid Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.08% for SCHC.

SCHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSS and SCHC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer