VSS vs. SCHC
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC).
VSS and SCHC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VSS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index. It was launched on Apr 2, 2009. SCHC is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux). It was launched on Jan 14, 2010. Both VSS and SCHC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VSS or SCHC.
Performance
VSS vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 3.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSS having a 4.47% annualized return and SCHC not far behind at 4.28%.
VSS
3.38%
-4.31%
-0.59%
10.85%
4.68%
4.47%
SCHC
3.12%
-4.09%
-0.91%
11.84%
3.92%
4.28%
Key characteristics
| VSS | SCHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.12 | 1.14 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.55 | 0.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.84 | 3.75 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.64% | 2.94% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.16% | 14.14% |
| Max Drawdown | -43.51% | -43.94% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.39% | -12.15% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VSS vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHC's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between VSS and SCHC is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VSS vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VSS vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than SCHC's 2.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 2.94% | 3.14% | 2.30% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 3.25% | 2.80% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 2.66% | 2.67% | 2.71% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 2.70% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.72% | 2.01% | 2.34% | 2.59% | 2.80% |
Drawdowns
VSS vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and SCHC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VSS vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) have volatilities of 3.69% and 3.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.