VSDA vs. PFM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VSDA (VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - VSDA tracks the Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index while PFM tracks the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VSDA returned 6.69%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for PFM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSDA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.

Performance

VSDA vs. PFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than PFM's 8.18% return.

VSDA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 4.72%
• 6M: 4.63%
• 1Y: 10.40%
• 3Y*: 9.81%
• 5Y*: 6.69%
• 10Y*: —

PFM

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSDA vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF	4.72%	6.67%	9.40%	8.74%	-4.42%	21.95%	12.72%	31.39%	-1.40%	14.27%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	8.18%	14.00%	16.87%	11.40%	-6.22%	23.08%	9.53%	26.88%	-4.58%	13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VSDA and PFM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2017	0.83

The correlation between VSDA and PFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VSDA vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VSDA	PFM
Consumer Defensive	31.5%	12.0%
Financial Services	21.0%	18.5%
Industrials	16.8%	11.1%
Basic Materials	8.0%	3.0%
Healthcare	7.6%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	5.1%	4.0%
Technology	4.7%	24.7%
Utilities	2.7%	4.2%
Energy	2.5%	4.7%
Communication Services	0.1%	1.1%
Real Estate	0.0%	2.0%

Return for Risk

VSDA vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDA

VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 24
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 23
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 22

PFM

PFM Risk / Return Rank: 62
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDA vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VSDA	PFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	2.09	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	3.07	-1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.38	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	2.78	-1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.84	11.28	-8.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VSDA vs. PFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the PFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDA and PFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VSDA	PFM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	2.09	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.79	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.53	+0.14

Drawdowns

VSDA vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and PFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VSDA	PFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.12%	-53.21%	+21.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-7.09%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.54%	-14.50%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.14%	-17.81%	+1.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.28%	-0.23%	-6.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.64%	-6.94%	+3.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	1.75%	+1.92%

Volatility

VSDA vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that VSDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VSDA	PFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	2.04%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.12%	7.13%	+0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.23%	9.47%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.03%	13.54%	+0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	15.21%	+1.38%

VSDA vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSDA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

VSDA vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison

VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than PFM's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.33%	1.41%	1.58%	1.86%	1.95%	1.69%	1.92%	1.94%	2.27%	1.70%	2.56%	2.36%
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF	2.61%	2.65%	2.36%	1.92%	1.83%	1.40%	1.49%	1.36%	1.69%	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VSDA and PFM in my portfolio?

VSDA and PFM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VSDA or PFM?

VSDA has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDA dropped -32.12% vs PFM's -53.21%.

Which ETF is better, VSDA or PFM?

On 5-year performance, PFM leads with 10.63% vs 6.69% for VSDA. On fees, VSDA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VSDA or PFM?

Over the 5-year period, PFM has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VSDA or PFM?

VSDA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VSDA or PFM?

VSDA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.33% for PFM.

What is the main difference between VSDA and PFM?

VSDA tracks Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSDA and 0.53% for PFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.