VSDA vs. CDC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

VSDA (VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF) and CDC (VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSDA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while CDC is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VSDA returned 7.76%/yr vs 6.36%/yr for CDC. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VSDA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for CDC.

Performance

VSDA vs. CDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 14.10% return.

VSDA

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 6M: 8.95%
• 1Y: 15.05%
• 3Y*: 11.25%
• 5Y*: 7.76%
• 10Y*: —

CDC

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 6M: 13.32%
• 1Y: 20.80%
• 3Y*: 13.02%
• 5Y*: 6.36%
• 10Y*: 10.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSDA vs. CDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF	10.08%	6.67%	9.40%	8.74%	-4.42%	21.95%	12.72%	31.39%	-1.40%	14.07%
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	14.10%	8.96%	14.48%	-4.99%	-7.86%	33.05%	12.88%	19.64%	-5.97%	11.54%

Correlation

The correlation between VSDA and CDC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017	0.78

The correlation between VSDA and CDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSDA vs. CDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VSDA	CDC
Consumer Defensive	31.6%	15.1%
Financial Services	21.2%	24.0%
Industrials	17.1%	4.4%
Basic Materials	8.1%	0.0%
Healthcare	7.4%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	7.0%
Technology	4.7%	5.0%
Utilities	2.6%	23.9%
Energy	2.4%	8.8%
Communication Services	0.0%	4.0%
Real Estate	0.0%	0.0%

Return for Risk

VSDA vs. CDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDA

VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 38
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 37
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 31

CDC

CDC Risk / Return Rank: 75
CDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
CDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
CDC Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
CDC Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDA vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VSDA	CDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.10	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	3.06	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.36	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	3.69	-2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.03	12.98	-8.95

VSDA vs. CDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the CDC Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDA and CDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VSDA vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, which is greater than CDC's maximum drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and CDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	VSDA	CDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.12%	-21.37%	-10.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.44%	-5.67%	-3.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.54%	-12.70%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.14%	-21.37%	+5.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-0.37%	-1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-5.09%	+1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.75%	1.61%	+2.14%

Volatility

VSDA vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VSDA	CDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	3.33%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.40%	7.11%	+1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.34%	9.98%	+1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.05%	12.52%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	13.21%	+3.36%

VSDA vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSDA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

VSDA vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison

VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than CDC's 3.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF	3.13%	3.36%	3.32%	4.24%	3.48%	2.65%	2.48%	3.04%	3.37%	2.81%	2.99%	3.17%
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF	2.52%	2.65%	2.36%	1.92%	1.83%	1.40%	1.49%	1.36%	1.69%	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VSDA and CDC in my portfolio?

VSDA and CDC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VSDA or CDC?

CDC has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to VSDA (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDA dropped -32.12% vs CDC's -21.37%.

Which ETF is better, VSDA or CDC?

On 5-year performance, VSDA leads with 7.76% vs 6.36% for CDC. On fees, VSDA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VSDA or CDC?

Over the 5-year period, VSDA has performed better with a 7.76% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VSDA or CDC?

VSDA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for CDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VSDA or CDC?

CDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.52% for VSDA.

What is the main difference between VSDA and CDC?

VSDA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CDC is Large Cap Value Equities. VSDA tracks Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while CDC tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSDA and 0.37% for CDC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.