VSDA vs. CDC
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC).
VSDA and CDC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VSDA is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2017. CDC is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 2, 2014. Both VSDA and CDC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VSDA or CDC.
Correlation
The correlation between VSDA and CDC is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
VSDA vs. CDC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
VSDA:
1.28
CDC:
1.87
VSDA:
1.81
CDC:
2.60
VSDA:
1.22
CDC:
1.33
VSDA:
1.46
CDC:
1.01
VSDA:
4.67
CDC:
7.98
VSDA:
2.86%
CDC:
2.58%
VSDA:
10.44%
CDC:
11.01%
VSDA:
-32.12%
CDC:
-21.37%
VSDA:
-5.84%
CDC:
-4.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than CDC's 2.63% return.
VSDA
1.61%
1.39%
5.10%
12.45%
9.24%
N/A
CDC
2.63%
2.85%
7.31%
20.24%
9.12%
9.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VSDA vs. CDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSDA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CDC's 0.37% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VSDA vs. CDC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
VSDA
CDC
VSDA vs. CDC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VSDA vs. CDC - Dividend Comparison
VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than CDC's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF | 2.39% | 2.36% | 1.93% | 1.83% | 1.40% | 1.49% | 1.36% | 1.69% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CDC VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.18% | 3.32% | 4.24% | 3.48% | 2.66% | 2.49% | 3.04% | 3.37% | 2.81% | 2.99% | 3.17% | 1.20% |
Drawdowns
VSDA vs. CDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, which is greater than CDC's maximum drawdown of -21.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and CDC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VSDA vs. CDC - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) have volatilities of 4.09% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.