VOT vs. NOW
VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index, while NOW (ServiceNow, Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VOT returned 12.41%/yr vs 20.67%/yr for NOW. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
VOT vs. NOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOT achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than NOW's -37.96% return. Over the past 10 years, VOT has underperformed NOW with an annualized return of 12.41%, while NOW has yielded a comparatively higher 20.67% annualized return.
VOT
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 9.90%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 13.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
NOW
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -37.96%
- 6M
- -38.04%
- 1Y
- -51.61%
- 3Y*
- -5.63%
- 5Y*
- -2.30%
- 10Y*
- 20.67%
VOT vs. NOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 9.90% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
NOW ServiceNow, Inc | -37.96% | -27.75% | 50.05% | 81.96% | -40.18% | 17.93% | 94.97% | 58.56% | 36.55% | 75.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOT and NOW is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VOT and NOW has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOT vs. NOW — Risk / Return Rank
VOT
NOW
VOT vs. NOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) and ServiceNow, Inc (NOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOT | NOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.80 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | -0.86 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | -1.49 | +3.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOT vs. NOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOT drawdown since its inception was -60.16%, smaller than the maximum NOW drawdown of -64.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOT and NOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOT | NOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.16% | -64.54% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.96% | -60.28% | +44.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.77% | -64.54% | +42.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | -64.54% | +27.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | -64.54% | +27.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -59.40% | +59.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.95% | -13.83% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 34.66% | -29.31% |
Volatility
VOT vs. NOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) is 6.83%, while ServiceNow, Inc (NOW) has a volatility of 24.39%. This indicates that VOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOT | NOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 24.39% | -17.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 45.83% | -32.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 50.47% | -33.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 43.51% | -22.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 40.90% | -19.84% |
Dividends
VOT vs. NOW - Dividend Comparison
VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while NOW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOW ServiceNow, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOT and NOW have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOW has higher volatility (24.39%) compared to VOT (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOT dropped -60.16% vs NOW's -64.54%.
VOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOT and NOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer