VOOV vs. MGV
VOOV (Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF) and MGV (Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds from Vanguard - VOOV tracks the S&P 500 Value Index while MGV tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOOV returned 12.14%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for MGV. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOOV charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGV.
Performance
VOOV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOOV achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly lower than MGV's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VOOV has underperformed MGV with an annualized return of 12.14%, while MGV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.
VOOV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 21.39%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.39%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
MGV
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
VOOV vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.89% | 13.10% | 12.21% | 22.15% | -5.37% | 24.87% | 1.23% | 31.75% | -9.09% | 15.26% |
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 16.85% | 15.45% | 16.94% | 9.16% | -1.22% | 25.93% | 2.50% | 25.54% | -4.13% | 16.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOOV and MGV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VOOV and MGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VOOV vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOOV
MGV
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
VOOV
MGV
Financial Services
VOOV
MGV
Healthcare
VOOV
MGV
Consumer Cyclical
VOOV
MGV
Industrials
VOOV
MGV
Consumer Defensive
VOOV
MGV
Energy
VOOV
MGV
Utilities
VOOV
MGV
Basic Materials
VOOV
MGV
Real Estate
VOOV
MGV
Communication Services
VOOV
MGV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOOV vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank
VOOV
MGV
VOOV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOOV | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.54 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 4.77 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | 18.12 | -5.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOOV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, smaller than the maximum MGV drawdown of -56.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and MGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOOV | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.31% | -56.07% | +18.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -6.42% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -13.18% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | -16.54% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.31% | -35.41% | -1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | 0.00% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -7.78% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.69% | -0.04% |
Volatility
VOOV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is 2.94%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that VOOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOOV | MGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 3.32% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.36% | 7.77% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.98% | 10.15% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 13.57% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 16.36% | +0.60% |
VOOV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOOV has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOOV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison
VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than MGV's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGV Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF | 1.82% | 2.04% | 2.31% | 2.48% | 2.45% | 2.17% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 2.34% | 2.53% | 2.59% |
VOOV Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.76% | 2.10% | 1.69% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.45% | 2.10% | 2.65% | 2.13% | 2.24% | 2.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOOV and MGV have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGV has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to VOOV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs MGV's -56.07%.
On 10-year performance, MGV leads with 13.43% vs 12.14% for VOOV. On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGV has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 12.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VOOV.
MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.67% for VOOV.
VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VOOV and 0.05% for MGV.
MGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOOV and MGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer