PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOOV vs. VOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOOV vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VOOV having a 10.13% return and VOOG slightly lower at 9.98%. Over the past 10 years, VOOV has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 11.86%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.31% annualized return.


VOOV

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.60%
6M
7.41%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.14%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
11.86%
ALL TIME*
12.18%

VOOG

1D
1.41%
1M
-0.16%
6M
9.44%
YTD
9.98%
1Y
21.57%
3Y*
23.95%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
17.31%
ALL TIME*
16.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$98.60M$105.57M$127.27M
$15.60M$14.29M$15.18M

VOOV vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
10.13%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.98%22.11%35.89%29.96%-29.48%31.95%33.35%30.93%-0.21%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between VOOV and VOOG is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between VOOV and VOOG has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VOOV vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOOV
VOOG

Technology

21.7%
52.4%

Financial Services

14.9%
8.6%

Healthcare

12.2%
6.2%

Industrials

10.7%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
1.0%

Energy

6.6%
0.1%

Utilities

4.4%
0.4%

Basic Materials

3.6%
0.3%

Real Estate

3.3%
0.6%

Communication Services

2.7%
15.6%

Technology

VOOV
21.7%
VOOG
52.4%

Financial Services

VOOV
14.9%
VOOG
8.6%

Healthcare

VOOV
12.2%
VOOG
6.2%

Industrials

VOOV
10.7%
VOOG
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VOOV
10.5%
VOOG
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

VOOV
8.8%
VOOG
1.0%

Energy

VOOV
6.6%
VOOG
0.1%

Utilities

VOOV
4.4%
VOOG
0.4%

Basic Materials

VOOV
3.6%
VOOG
0.3%

Real Estate

VOOV
3.3%
VOOG
0.6%

Communication Services

VOOV
2.7%
VOOG
15.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOOV vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOG
VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VOOV vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOOVVOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.19

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

1.41

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.04

5.13

+6.91

VOOV vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOOV and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOOV vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOOV drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOOV and VOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOOVVOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.31%

-32.73%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.27%

-13.71%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-22.18%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

-32.73%

+14.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

-32.73%

-4.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-4.38%

+3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-4.96%

+1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

3.77%

-2.14%

Volatility

VOOV vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) is 2.65%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that VOOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOOVVOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

6.11%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

14.81%

-7.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

17.97%

-7.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

21.52%

-7.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

20.87%

-3.99%

VOOV vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VOOV and VOOG have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOOV vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

VOOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than VOOG's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.46%0.49%0.49%1.12%0.93%0.53%0.88%1.26%1.34%1.32%1.47%1.56%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.67%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOOV and VOOG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOOG has higher volatility (6.11%) compared to VOOV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOOV dropped -37.31% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

On 10-year performance, VOOG leads with 17.31% vs 11.86% for VOOV. Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 17.31% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOV and VOOG have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.46% for VOOG.

VOOV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VOOG is S&P 500. VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index.

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOOV and VOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer