VOO vs. IGV
VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while IGV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOO returned 14.98%/yr vs 15.60%/yr for IGV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VOO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.
Performance
VOO vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOO achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -12.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VOO having a 14.98% annualized return and IGV not far ahead at 15.60%.
VOO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 14.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.77%
IGV
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- 6M
- -5.40%
- YTD
- -12.01%
- 1Y
- -16.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.30%
VOO vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.44% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -12.01% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOO and IGV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VOO and IGV has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VOO vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOO
IGV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VOO
IGV
Financial Services
VOO
IGV
Communication Services
VOO
IGV
Consumer Cyclical
VOO
IGV
Healthcare
VOO
IGV
-
Industrials
VOO
IGV
Consumer Defensive
VOO
IGV
-
Energy
VOO
IGV
-
Utilities
VOO
IGV
-
Real Estate
VOO
IGV
-
Basic Materials
VOO
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOO vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
VOO
IGV
VOO vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOO | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.92 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | -0.45 | +2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.63 | -0.86 | +10.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOO vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOO drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOO and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOO | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -63.45% | +29.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -36.61% | +27.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.69% | -36.61% | +17.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.52% | -45.85% | +21.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -45.85% | +11.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -21.05% | +19.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -14.48% | +10.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 18.89% | -16.85% |
Volatility
VOO vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is 3.36%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a volatility of 7.17%. This indicates that VOO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOO | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 7.17% | -3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 25.18% | -15.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 28.69% | -16.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 28.08% | -11.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 26.41% | -8.41% |
VOO vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VOO vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than IGV's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOO and IGV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (7.17%) compared to VOO (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOO dropped -33.99% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 10-year performance, IGV leads with 15.60% vs 14.98% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGV has performed better with a 15.60% return vs 14.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGV.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
VOO is categorized as S&P 500, while IGV is Technology Equities. VOO tracks S&P 500 Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VOO and 0.39% for IGV.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOO and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer