PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONV vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 12.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VONV having a 11.35% annualized return and VYM not far ahead at 11.90%.


VONV

1D
0.00%
1M
4.28%
YTD
14.28%
6M
14.88%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.35%

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.28%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VONV and VYM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.95

The correlation between VONV and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONV
VYM

Financial Services

18.9%
20.5%

Technology

14.9%
17.7%

Industrials

13.1%
12.1%

Healthcare

10.9%
12.2%

Communication Services

8.5%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
8.1%

Energy

7.0%
9.8%

Utilities

4.4%
5.7%

Real Estate

4.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

3.8%
3.5%

Financial Services

VONV
18.9%
VYM
20.5%

Technology

VONV
14.9%
VYM
17.7%

Industrials

VONV
13.1%
VYM
12.1%

Healthcare

VONV
10.9%
VYM
12.2%

Communication Services

VONV
8.5%
VYM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VONV
7.3%
VYM
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

VONV
7.2%
VYM
8.1%

Energy

VONV
7.0%
VYM
9.8%

Utilities

VONV
4.4%
VYM
5.7%

Real Estate

VONV
4.1%
VYM
0.0%

Basic Materials

VONV
3.8%
VYM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VONVVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.46

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

3.93

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.54

14.76

+2.78

VONV vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONV Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONV and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VONVVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

2.56

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.83

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.73

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.51

+0.20

Drawdowns

VONV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONVVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-56.98%

+18.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-6.69%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

-14.46%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

-15.84%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

-35.21%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.43%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-7.19%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.78%

-0.16%

Volatility

VONV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that VONV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONVVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.77%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

7.67%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

10.28%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

13.96%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

16.34%

+0.90%

VONV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.63%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VONV and VYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONV has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.90% vs 11.35% for VONV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONV.

VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.63% for VONV.

VONV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.04% for VYM.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONV and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer