VONV vs. VYM
VONV (Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONV returned 11.35%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for VYM. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VONV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
VONV vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 12.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VONV having a 11.35% annualized return and VYM not far ahead at 11.90%.
VONV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
VONV vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 14.28% | 15.81% | 14.28% | 11.40% | -7.65% | 25.28% | 2.71% | 26.48% | -8.45% | 13.59% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.47% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONV and VYM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VONV and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VONV vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONV
VYM
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
VONV
VYM
Technology
VONV
VYM
Industrials
VONV
VYM
Healthcare
VONV
VYM
Communication Services
VONV
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
VONV
VYM
Consumer Defensive
VONV
VYM
Energy
VONV
VYM
Utilities
VONV
VYM
Real Estate
VONV
VYM
Basic Materials
VONV
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONV vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
VONV
VYM
VONV vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VONV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.46 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 3.93 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.54 | 14.76 | +2.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VONV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.56 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.83 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.73 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.51 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
VONV vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.21% | -56.98% | +18.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.81% | -6.69% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.70% | -14.46% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.87% | -15.84% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.21% | -35.21% | -3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.43% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -7.19% | +3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 1.78% | -0.16% |
Volatility
VONV vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.77%. This indicates that VONV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONV | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 2.77% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.09% | 7.67% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 10.28% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 13.96% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 16.34% | +0.90% |
VONV vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONV vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.97% | 2.10% | 2.22% | 1.67% | 2.25% | 2.30% | 2.56% | 2.18% | 2.39% | 2.38% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, VONV and VYM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VONV has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to VYM (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.90% vs 11.35% for VONV. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.90% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONV.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.63% for VONV.
VONV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.04% for VYM.
VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONV and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer