PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONV vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONV vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VONV has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 11.35%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


VONV

1D
0.00%
1M
4.28%
YTD
14.28%
6M
14.88%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.35%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONV vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
14.28%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VONV and VUG is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.74

The correlation between VONV and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VONV vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONV
VUG

Financial Services

18.9%
4.3%

Technology

14.9%
53.5%

Industrials

13.1%
3.6%

Healthcare

10.9%
4.6%

Communication Services

8.5%
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
1.5%

Energy

7.0%
0.4%

Utilities

4.4%
0.9%

Real Estate

4.1%
1.0%

Basic Materials

3.8%
0.6%

Financial Services

VONV
18.9%
VUG
4.3%

Technology

VONV
14.9%
VUG
53.5%

Industrials

VONV
13.1%
VUG
3.6%

Healthcare

VONV
10.9%
VUG
4.6%

Communication Services

VONV
8.5%
VUG
17.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VONV
7.3%
VUG
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

VONV
7.2%
VUG
1.5%

Energy

VONV
7.0%
VUG
0.4%

Utilities

VONV
4.4%
VUG
0.9%

Real Estate

VONV
4.1%
VUG
1.0%

Basic Materials

VONV
3.8%
VUG
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONV vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONV vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VONVVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.31

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

1.69

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.54

5.92

+11.62

VONV vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONV Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONV and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VONVVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

1.77

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.68

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.85

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.62

+0.09

Drawdowns

VONV vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONVVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-50.68%

+12.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-16.53%

+9.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

-22.85%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

-35.61%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

-35.61%

-2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.51%

+1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-7.09%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

4.71%

-3.09%

Volatility

VONV vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) is 2.94%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that VONV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONVVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.83%

-0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

12.11%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

15.84%

-5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

22.22%

-7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

21.44%

-4.20%

VONV vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONV vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.63%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VONV and VUG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VONV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.26% vs 11.35% for VONV. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VONV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VONV.

VONV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

VONV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.03% for VUG.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONV and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer