VONV vs. VTWV
VONV (Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF) and VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VONV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index, while VTWV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VONV returned 11.35%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for VTWV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VONV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VTWV.
Performance
VONV vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 17.44% return. Over the past 10 years, VONV has outperformed VTWV with an annualized return of 11.35%, while VTWV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.32% annualized return.
VONV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.56%
- 5Y*
- 10.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
VTWV
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 41.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
VONV vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 14.28% | 15.81% | 14.28% | 11.40% | -7.65% | 25.28% | 2.71% | 26.48% | -8.45% | 13.59% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 17.44% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 8.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VONV and VTWV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.83 |
The correlation between VONV and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
VONV vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VONV
VTWV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
VONV
VTWV
Technology
VONV
VTWV
Industrials
VONV
VTWV
Healthcare
VONV
VTWV
Communication Services
VONV
VTWV
Consumer Cyclical
VONV
VTWV
Consumer Defensive
VONV
VTWV
Energy
VONV
VTWV
Utilities
VONV
VTWV
Real Estate
VONV
VTWV
Basic Materials
VONV
VTWV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VONV vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank
VONV
VTWV
VONV vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VONV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.39 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 4.83 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.54 | 16.46 | +1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VONV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | 2.30 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.31 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.44 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.49 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
VONV vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum VTWV drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and VTWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VONV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.21% | -45.73% | +7.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.81% | -8.64% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.70% | -26.72% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.87% | -26.72% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.21% | -45.73% | +7.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.43% | +1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.91% | -7.81% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 2.53% | -0.91% |
Volatility
VONV vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) is 2.94%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that VONV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VONV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 5.06% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.09% | 12.15% | -4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 18.17% | -7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.77% | 21.72% | -6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 23.54% | -6.30% |
VONV vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VONV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VONV vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison
VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than VTWV's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VONV Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.97% | 2.10% | 2.22% | 1.67% | 2.25% | 2.30% | 2.56% | 2.18% | 2.39% | 2.38% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VONV and VTWV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to VONV (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs VTWV's -45.73%.
On 10-year performance, VONV leads with 11.35% vs 10.32% for VTWV. On fees, VONV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONV has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VONV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.
VONV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.58% for VTWV.
VONV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VTWV is Small Cap Value Equities. VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VONV and 0.10% for VTWV.
VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VONV and VTWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer