PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VONV vs. VTWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VONV vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VONV achieves a 18.82% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 23.60% return. Over the past 10 years, VONV has outperformed VTWV with an annualized return of 11.38%, while VTWV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.43% annualized return.


VONV

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.25%
6M
14.13%
YTD
18.82%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
11.38%

VTWV

1D
-0.82%
1M
4.14%
6M
14.69%
YTD
23.60%
1Y
37.97%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
10.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VONV vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
18.82%15.81%14.28%11.40%-7.65%25.28%2.71%26.48%-8.45%13.59%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
23.60%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%27.90%4.88%22.44%-13.34%8.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VONV and VTWV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.83

The correlation between VONV and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VONV vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VONV
VTWV

Technology

18.6%
11.6%

Financial Services

18.2%
24.0%

Industrials

12.6%
12.2%

Healthcare

10.7%
10.1%

Communication Services

8.2%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.2%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
2.1%

Energy

6.3%
7.8%

Utilities

4.0%
5.0%

Real Estate

3.9%
10.2%

Basic Materials

3.7%
5.4%

Technology

VONV
18.6%
VTWV
11.6%

Financial Services

VONV
18.2%
VTWV
24.0%

Industrials

VONV
12.6%
VTWV
12.2%

Healthcare

VONV
10.7%
VTWV
10.1%

Communication Services

VONV
8.2%
VTWV
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VONV
7.2%
VTWV
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

VONV
6.7%
VTWV
2.1%

Energy

VONV
6.3%
VTWV
7.8%

Utilities

VONV
4.0%
VTWV
5.0%

Real Estate

VONV
3.9%
VTWV
10.2%

Basic Materials

VONV
3.7%
VTWV
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VONV vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VONV
VONV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VONV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONV Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VONV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONV Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VONV vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VONVVTWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.37

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

4.42

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.64

15.21

+2.43

VONV vs. VTWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VONV Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the VTWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VONV and VTWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VONV vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VONV drawdown since its inception was -38.21%, smaller than the maximum VTWV drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VONV and VTWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VONVVTWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.21%

-45.73%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-8.64%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.70%

-26.72%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

-26.72%

+7.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.21%

-45.73%

+7.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.82%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-7.76%

+3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.50%

-0.87%

Volatility

VONV vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF (VONV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VONVVTWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.38%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

12.52%

-3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

17.90%

-6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

21.62%

-6.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

23.47%

-6.28%

VONV vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VONV and VTWV have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VONV vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison

VONV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than VTWV's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.58%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.60%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


VONV and VTWV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTWV has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to VONV (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VONV dropped -38.21% vs VTWV's -45.73%.

On 10-year performance, VONV leads with 11.38% vs 10.43% for VTWV. Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VONV has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VONV and VTWV have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 1.58% for VONV.

VONV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VTWV is Small Cap Value Equities. VONV tracks Russell 1000 Value Index, while VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index.

VONV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VONV and VTWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer