VOE vs. VFH
VOE (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VOE is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VOE returned 10.92%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for VFH. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VOE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFH.
Performance
VOE vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VOE achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VOE has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 10.92%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.15% annualized return.
VOE
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 11.83%
- 1Y
- 24.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
VFH
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
VOE vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 12.81% | 12.08% | 14.00% | 9.85% | -7.97% | 28.78% | 2.65% | 27.85% | -12.48% | 17.07% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -1.58% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VOE and VFH is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006 | 0.87 |
The correlation between VOE and VFH shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VOE vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VOE
VFH
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
VOE
VFH
Industrials
VOE
VFH
Energy
VOE
VFH
-
Utilities
VOE
VFH
-
Technology
VOE
VFH
Consumer Defensive
VOE
VFH
-
Healthcare
VOE
VFH
Real Estate
VOE
VFH
Basic Materials
VOE
VFH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VOE
VFH
Communication Services
VOE
VFH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VOE vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
VOE
VFH
VOE vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VOE | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.10 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 0.52 | +3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.34 | 1.35 | +11.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VOE vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VOE drawdown since its inception was -61.50%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOE and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VOE | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.50% | -78.61% | +17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -14.75% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -17.30% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.70% | -25.66% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.18% | -44.42% | +1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.57% | +4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.34% | -18.52% | +10.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 5.65% | -3.82% |
Volatility
VOE vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is 3.19%, while Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that VOE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VOE | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 4.33% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | 11.41% | -3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.63% | 15.06% | -3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 19.34% | -3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 22.55% | -3.72% |
VOE vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VOE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VOE vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
VOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than VFH's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.48% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.84% | 2.10% | 2.11% | 2.27% | 2.27% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VOE and VFH have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFH has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to VOE (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOE dropped -61.50% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 13.15% vs 10.92% for VOE. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 13.15% return vs 10.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VFH.
VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.48% for VFH.
VOE is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VFH is Financials Equities. VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOE and 0.09% for VFH.
VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VOE and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer