VO vs. SPYM
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.77%/yr vs 15.52%/yr for SPYM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
VO vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 11.77%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.52% annualized return.
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
SPYM
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 9.10%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.52%
VO vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 9.10% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and SPYM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005 | 0.82 |
The correlation between VO and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VO vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VO
SPYM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
VO
SPYM
Industrials
VO
SPYM
Financial Services
VO
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
VO
SPYM
Energy
VO
SPYM
Utilities
VO
SPYM
Healthcare
VO
SPYM
Real Estate
VO
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
VO
SPYM
Basic Materials
VO
SPYM
Communication Services
VO
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
VO
SPYM
VO vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VO | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.75 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 12.42 | -3.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VO vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -54.46% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -8.90% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -18.72% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -24.48% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -33.87% | -5.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -2.35% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -7.15% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.97% | +0.19% |
Volatility
VO vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.33% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 9.58% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 12.26% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 16.87% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 18.03% | +0.93% |
VO vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VO vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than SPYM's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.29% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VO and SPYM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYM has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.52% vs 11.77% for VO. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.52% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.03% for VO.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.29% for SPYM.
VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VO and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer