VO vs. SPHQ
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.77%/yr vs 15.27%/yr for SPHQ. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
VO vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.79% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 11.77%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 15.77%
- 1Y
- 24.32%
- 3Y*
- 22.40%
- 5Y*
- 14.55%
- 10Y*
- 15.27%
VO vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.79% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and SPHQ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005 | 0.88 |
The correlation between VO and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
VO vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VO
SPHQ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
VO
SPHQ
Industrials
VO
SPHQ
Financial Services
VO
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
VO
SPHQ
Energy
VO
SPHQ
Utilities
VO
SPHQ
Healthcare
VO
SPHQ
Real Estate
VO
SPHQ
-
Consumer Defensive
VO
SPHQ
Basic Materials
VO
SPHQ
Communication Services
VO
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
VO
SPHQ
VO vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VO | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.32 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.75 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 11.76 | -3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VO vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -57.83% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -8.90% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -16.57% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -25.04% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -31.60% | -7.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | 0.00% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -10.69% | +2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.09% | +0.07% |
Volatility
VO vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.31%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 4.92% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 10.83% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 13.18% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 16.53% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 17.90% | +1.06% |
VO vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VO vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VO and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.27% vs 11.77% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.27% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.
VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VO and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer