PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VO vs. SPHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VO vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 16.79% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 11.77%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.27% annualized return.


VO

1D
0.97%
1M
3.61%
YTD
10.43%
6M
9.31%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
11.77%

SPHQ

1D
1.02%
1M
5.98%
YTD
16.79%
6M
15.77%
1Y
24.32%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
15.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VO vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.43%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
16.79%13.25%25.44%24.83%-15.76%28.03%17.36%33.64%-7.10%19.10%

Correlation

The correlation between VO and SPHQ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005

0.88

The correlation between VO and SPHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VO vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VO
SPHQ

Technology

18.6%
28.1%

Industrials

17.9%
24.3%

Financial Services

12.8%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.6%
4.6%

Energy

8.5%
0.7%

Utilities

8.3%
1.0%

Healthcare

7.6%
8.4%

Real Estate

5.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
15.4%

Basic Materials

4.2%
2.2%

Communication Services

3.1%
2.0%

Technology

VO
18.6%
SPHQ
28.1%

Industrials

VO
17.9%
SPHQ
24.3%

Financial Services

VO
12.8%
SPHQ
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VO
8.6%
SPHQ
4.6%

Energy

VO
8.5%
SPHQ
0.7%

Utilities

VO
8.3%
SPHQ
1.0%

Healthcare

VO
7.6%
SPHQ
8.4%

Real Estate

VO
5.4%
SPHQ

-

Consumer Defensive

VO
4.8%
SPHQ
15.4%

Basic Materials

VO
4.2%
SPHQ
2.2%

Communication Services

VO
3.1%
SPHQ
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VO vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHQ
SPHQ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VO vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOSPHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.75

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.44

11.76

-3.33

VO vs. SPHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VO Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the SPHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VO and SPHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VO vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and SPHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOSPHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-57.83%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-8.90%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-16.57%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-25.04%

-2.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.37%

-31.60%

-7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-10.69%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.09%

+0.07%

Volatility

VO vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.31%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOSPHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

4.92%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

10.83%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

13.18%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

16.53%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

17.90%

+1.06%

VO vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VO vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison

VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than SPHQ's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPHQ
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF
1.03%1.09%1.15%1.42%1.85%1.19%1.55%1.51%1.85%1.57%1.67%2.29%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VO and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHQ has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.

On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.27% vs 11.77% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.27% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.03% for SPHQ.

VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VO and 0.15% for SPHQ.

SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VO and SPHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer