SPHQ vs. JQUA
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index while JQUA tracks the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPHQ returned 12.73%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for JQUA. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.
Performance
SPHQ vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 13.51% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.93% return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -3.64%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- YTD
- 13.51%
- 1Y
- 21.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.01%
JQUA
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.79M | $28.22M | $36.46M | |
| $119.48M | $136.23M | $143.26M |
SPHQ vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 13.51% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 4.34% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.93% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 28.47% | -2.98% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and JQUA is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SPHQ and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPHQ vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHQ
JQUA
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHQ
JQUA
Industrials
SPHQ
JQUA
Financial Services
SPHQ
JQUA
Consumer Defensive
SPHQ
JQUA
Communication Services
SPHQ
JQUA
Consumer Cyclical
SPHQ
JQUA
Utilities
SPHQ
JQUA
Healthcare
SPHQ
JQUA
Basic Materials
SPHQ
JQUA
Energy
SPHQ
JQUA
Real Estate
SPHQ
-
JQUA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
JQUA
SPHQ vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHQ | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.95 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 12.05 | -3.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, which is greater than JQUA's maximum drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and JQUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -32.92% | -24.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -7.13% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -16.81% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -22.47% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -0.36% | -5.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.64% | -4.10% | -6.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 1.74% | +0.75% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) at 2.34%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.84% | 2.34% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 9.47% | +2.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.53% | 12.04% | +2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 15.72% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 17.93% | +0.04% |
SPHQ vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than JQUA's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.10% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and JQUA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to JQUA (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs JQUA's -32.92%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 12.89% vs 12.73% for SPHQ. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 12.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 1.08% for JQUA.
SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.12% for JQUA.
JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and JQUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer