SPHQ vs. SPYV
SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - SPHQ tracks the S&P 500 Quality Index while SPYV tracks the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ returned 15.46%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for SPYV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPHQ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
SPHQ vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPHQ achieves a 16.54% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SPHQ has outperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 15.46%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.11% annualized return.
SPHQ
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 16.54%
- 6M
- 15.11%
- 1Y
- 25.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.34%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.46%
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
SPHQ vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.54% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.47% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPHQ and SPYV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2005 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SPHQ and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPHQ vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPHQ
SPYV
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
SPHQ
SPYV
Industrials
SPHQ
SPYV
Consumer Defensive
SPHQ
SPYV
Financial Services
SPHQ
SPYV
Healthcare
SPHQ
SPYV
Consumer Cyclical
SPHQ
SPYV
Communication Services
SPHQ
SPYV
Basic Materials
SPHQ
SPYV
Utilities
SPHQ
SPYV
Energy
SPHQ
SPYV
Real Estate
SPHQ
-
SPYV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPHQ vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
SPHQ
SPYV
SPHQ vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPHQ | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.24 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 12.32 | +0.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPHQ vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPHQ drawdown since its inception was -57.83%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPHQ and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPHQ | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.83% | -58.45% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.90% | -6.22% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.57% | -17.54% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.04% | -17.89% | -7.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.60% | -36.89% | +5.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -1.24% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.68% | -8.70% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.63% | +0.44% |
Volatility
SPHQ vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.90%. This indicates that SPHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPHQ | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | 2.90% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 7.33% | +3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.46% | 9.97% | +3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 14.38% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.91% | 16.93% | +0.98% |
SPHQ vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPHQ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SPHQ vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
SPHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than SPYV's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.07% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPHQ and SPYV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to SPYV (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPHQ dropped -57.83% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 15.46% vs 12.11% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 12.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.07% for SPHQ.
SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SPHQ and 0.04% for SPYV.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPHQ and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer