VO vs. FSHOX
VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) and FSHOX (Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio) are both funds - VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while FSHOX is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, VO returned 11.77%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for FSHOX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VO charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for FSHOX.
Performance
VO vs. FSHOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly higher than FSHOX's 7.27% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has underperformed FSHOX with an annualized return of 11.77%, while FSHOX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
FSHOX
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 15.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
VO vs. FSHOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | 7.27% | 5.24% | 15.28% | 30.85% | -22.76% | 57.51% | 25.95% | 41.15% | -15.87% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between VO and FSHOX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.85 |
The correlation between VO and FSHOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VO vs. FSHOX — Risk / Return Rank
VO
FSHOX
VO vs. FSHOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VO | FSHOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.13 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 0.84 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 2.12 | +6.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VO vs. FSHOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, roughly equal to the maximum FSHOX drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and FSHOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VO | FSHOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -61.68% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -16.54% | +8.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.02% | -24.76% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -33.23% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.37% | -43.67% | +4.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -7.50% | +7.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -9.84% | +1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 6.50% | -4.34% |
Volatility
VO vs. FSHOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is 4.31%, while Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that VO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSHOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VO | FSHOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 7.41% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 16.57% | -6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.74% | 20.56% | -7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 21.82% | -4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.96% | 22.54% | -3.58% |
VO vs. FSHOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VO has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FSHOX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
VO vs. FSHOX - Dividend Comparison
VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than FSHOX's 6.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | 6.00% | 3.91% | 4.05% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 5.45% | 4.73% | 7.91% | 15.47% | 13.62% | 3.61% | 3.26% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VO and FSHOX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSHOX has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs FSHOX's -61.68%.
VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VO and FSHOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer