FSHOX vs. ITB
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB).
FSHOX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 28, 1986. ITB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index. It was launched on May 1, 2006.
Performance
FSHOX vs. ITB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSHOX vs. ITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | -0.37% | 5.24% | 15.28% | 30.85% | -22.76% | 57.51% | 25.95% | 41.15% | -15.87% | 26.25% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | -5.30% | -5.26% | 2.06% | 68.91% | -26.26% | 49.25% | 26.42% | 48.70% | -30.92% | 59.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSHOX achieves a -0.37% return, which is significantly higher than ITB's -5.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSHOX having a 14.12% annualized return and ITB not far behind at 13.64%.
FSHOX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -10.25%
- YTD
- -0.37%
- 6M
- -4.78%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.12%
ITB
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -13.12%
- YTD
- -5.30%
- 6M
- -15.52%
- 1Y
- -3.26%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSHOX vs. ITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSHOX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than ITB's 0.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSHOX vs. ITB — Risk / Return Rank
FSHOX
ITB
FSHOX vs. ITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSHOX | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | -0.11 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 0.07 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.01 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | -0.13 | +0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.33 | -0.31 | +2.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSHOX | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | -0.11 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.22 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.46 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.11 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSHOX and ITB is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSHOX vs. ITB - Dividend Comparison
FSHOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than ITB's 1.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHOX Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio | 3.92% | 3.91% | 4.05% | 0.82% | 0.80% | 5.45% | 4.73% | 7.91% | 15.47% | 13.62% | 3.61% | 3.26% |
ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF | 1.25% | 1.67% | 0.46% | 0.48% | 0.86% | 0.37% | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.63% | 0.28% | 0.43% | 0.34% |
Drawdowns
FSHOX vs. ITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSHOX drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, smaller than the maximum ITB drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHOX and ITB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSHOX | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.68% | -86.53% | +24.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.54% | -24.45% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.23% | -40.55% | +7.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.67% | -52.10% | +8.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.54% | -28.21% | +11.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.85% | -37.20% | +27.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.31% | 10.53% | -5.22% |
Volatility
FSHOX vs. ITB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) have volatilities of 7.70% and 8.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSHOX | ITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 8.02% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 19.22% | -5.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 30.43% | -8.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 29.07% | -7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 29.81% | -7.50% |