PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSHOX vs. FSPCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSHOX vs. FSPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSHOX achieves a 9.98% return, which is significantly higher than FSPCX's -1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FSHOX has outperformed FSPCX with an annualized return of 15.20%, while FSPCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.21% annualized return.


FSHOX

1D
2.00%
1M
6.25%
YTD
9.98%
6M
8.88%
1Y
18.80%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
11.76%
10Y*
15.20%

FSPCX

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.09%
YTD
-1.39%
6M
-2.10%
1Y
-1.08%
3Y*
13.74%
5Y*
13.04%
10Y*
12.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSHOX vs. FSPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSHOX
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio
9.98%5.24%15.28%30.85%-22.76%57.51%25.95%41.15%-15.87%26.25%
FSPCX
Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio
-1.39%3.45%28.44%12.98%7.75%29.26%0.00%30.06%-11.99%15.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FSHOX and FSPCX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 1986

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between FSHOX and FSPCX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSHOX vs. FSPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSHOX
FSHOX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FSHOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSHOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSHOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FSHOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSHOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPCX
FSPCX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FSPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSHOX vs. FSPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) and Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSHOXFSPCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.01

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

-0.05

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

-0.10

+3.09

FSHOX vs. FSPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSHOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the FSPCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSHOX and FSPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSHOX vs. FSPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSHOX drawdown since its inception was -61.68%, smaller than the maximum FSPCX drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHOX and FSPCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSHOXFSPCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.68%

-69.48%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.54%

-9.98%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-11.69%

-13.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.23%

-16.65%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.67%

-43.68%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.16%

-6.07%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-9.70%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

5.00%

+1.54%

Volatility

FSHOX vs. FSPCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio (FSHOX) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio (FSPCX) at 5.06%. This indicates that FSHOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSHOXFSPCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.09%

5.06%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.68%

10.95%

+5.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.60%

15.46%

+5.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.85%

17.50%

+4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.55%

20.12%

+2.43%

FSHOX vs. FSPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSHOX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPCX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSHOX vs. FSPCX - Dividend Comparison

FSHOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than FSPCX's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSHOX
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing Portfolio
5.86%3.91%4.05%0.82%0.80%5.45%4.73%7.91%15.47%13.62%3.61%3.26%
FSPCX
Fidelity Select Insurance Portfolio
4.77%3.35%8.72%8.48%0.74%8.40%8.80%6.90%32.69%12.52%2.81%3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSHOX and FSPCX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSHOX has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to FSPCX (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHOX dropped -61.68% vs FSPCX's -69.48%.

FSHOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSHOX and FSPCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer