PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VO vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VO vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VO achieves a 10.43% return, which is significantly higher than AGG's 0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, VO has outperformed AGG with an annualized return of 11.77%, while AGG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.57% annualized return.


VO

1D
0.97%
1M
2.97%
YTD
10.43%
6M
9.31%
1Y
19.60%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
11.77%

AGG

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.93%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
4.19%
5Y*
0.06%
10Y*
1.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VO vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.43%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.52%7.19%1.31%5.65%-13.02%-1.77%7.48%8.46%0.09%3.55%

Correlation

The correlation between VO and AGG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

-0.08

The correlation between VO and AGG shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VO vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VO vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOAGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.63

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.44

4.82

+3.62

VO vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VO Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VO and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VO vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VO drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than AGG's maximum drawdown of -18.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VO and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-18.43%

-40.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-2.76%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.02%

-6.11%

-12.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-17.82%

-9.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.37%

-18.43%

-20.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.88%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-2.71%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

0.94%

+1.22%

Volatility

VO vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) at 1.37%. This indicates that VO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

1.37%

+2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

2.81%

+6.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.74%

3.82%

+8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

6.09%

+11.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

5.41%

+13.55%

VO vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VO and AGG have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VO vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than AGG's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
3.98%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


VO and AGG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VO has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to AGG (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VO dropped -58.87% vs AGG's -18.43%.

On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.77% vs 1.57% for AGG. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, AGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.77% return vs 1.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO and AGG have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.

AGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 1.36% for VO.

VO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while AGG is Total Bond Market. VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index, while AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.

VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VO and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer