PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIS vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIS vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VIS has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 14.06%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.26% annualized return.


VIS

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.27%
YTD
14.63%
6M
15.23%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
12.60%
10Y*
14.06%

VUG

1D
-1.23%
1M
6.22%
YTD
9.49%
6M
8.72%
1Y
27.84%
3Y*
25.93%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
18.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIS vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
14.63%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.49%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VIS and VUG is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between VIS and VUG has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VIS vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIS
VUG

Industrials

89.4%
3.6%

Technology

4.5%
53.5%

Utilities

4.3%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
12.2%

Financial Services

0.2%
4.3%

Energy

0.1%
0.4%

Basic Materials

0.1%
0.6%

Communication Services

0.0%
17.3%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.0%

Healthcare

0.0%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.5%

Industrials

VIS
89.4%
VUG
3.6%

Technology

VIS
4.5%
VUG
53.5%

Utilities

VIS
4.3%
VUG
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VIS
1.1%
VUG
12.2%

Financial Services

VIS
0.2%
VUG
4.3%

Energy

VIS
0.1%
VUG
0.4%

Basic Materials

VIS
0.1%
VUG
0.6%

Communication Services

VIS
0.0%
VUG
17.3%

Real Estate

VIS
0.0%
VUG
1.0%

Healthcare

VIS
0.0%
VUG
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

VIS

-

VUG
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIS vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIS vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VISVUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

1.77

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.37

2.40

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.69

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.06

5.92

+3.14

VIS vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIS and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VISVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.77

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.68

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.85

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.62

-0.10

Drawdowns

VIS vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VISVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.51%

-50.68%

-12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.29%

-16.53%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.80%

-22.85%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.96%

-35.61%

+12.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.42%

-35.61%

-6.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-1.51%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.38%

-7.09%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

4.71%

-1.75%

Volatility

VIS vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 3.83%. This indicates that VIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VISVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

3.83%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.47%

12.11%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.42%

15.84%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

22.22%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.43%

21.44%

-1.01%

VIS vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIS vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.89%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIS and VUG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIS has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to VUG (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.26% vs 14.06% for VIS. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.26% return vs 14.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VIS.

VIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

VIS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VIS and 0.03% for VUG.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIS and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer