VIS vs. VFH
VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) and VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VIS returned 14.22%/yr vs 13.15%/yr for VFH. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
VIS vs. VFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIS achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's -1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, VIS has outperformed VFH with an annualized return of 14.22%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively lower 13.15% annualized return.
VIS
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
VFH
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 9.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
VIS vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 15.65% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -1.58% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIS and VFH is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.80 |
The correlation between VIS and VFH shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VIS vs. VFH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIS
VFH
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Industrials
VIS
VFH
Technology
VIS
VFH
Utilities
VIS
VFH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VIS
VFH
Financial Services
VIS
VFH
Energy
VIS
VFH
-
Basic Materials
VIS
VFH
-
Communication Services
VIS
VFH
Real Estate
VIS
VFH
Healthcare
VIS
VFH
Consumer Defensive
VIS
-
VFH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIS vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank
VIS
VFH
VIS vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIS | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.10 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 0.52 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 1.35 | +7.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIS vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIS drawdown since its inception was -63.51%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIS and VFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIS | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.51% | -78.61% | +15.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -14.75% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.80% | -17.30% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.96% | -25.66% | +2.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.42% | -44.42% | +2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -4.57% | +4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -18.52% | +10.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 5.65% | -2.68% |
Volatility
VIS vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 4.33%. This indicates that VIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIS | VFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 4.33% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.28% | 11.41% | +2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 15.06% | +2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 19.34% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 22.55% | -2.07% |
VIS vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VIS and VFH have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VIS vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison
VIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than VFH's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.48% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIS and VFH have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to VFH (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIS dropped -63.51% vs VFH's -78.61%.
On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.22% vs 13.15% for VFH. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIS and VFH have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.88% for VIS.
VIS is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VFH is Financials Equities. VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index, while VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index.
VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIS and VFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer