PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIOG vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIOG vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIOG achieves a 15.37% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VIOG has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 10.83%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


VIOG

1D
-0.65%
1M
0.86%
YTD
15.37%
6M
13.49%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
10.83%

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIOG vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
15.37%5.40%9.23%16.92%-21.14%22.49%19.68%21.16%-4.57%14.70%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VIOG and VT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.79

The correlation between VIOG and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

VIOG vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIOG
VT

Technology

19.7%
27.8%

Industrials

19.5%
12.0%

Healthcare

14.6%
8.1%

Financial Services

13.7%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
9.5%

Real Estate

6.6%
2.4%

Energy

4.1%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
4.2%

Communication Services

2.7%
8.3%

Utilities

1.7%
2.7%

Technology

VIOG
19.7%
VT
27.8%

Industrials

VIOG
19.5%
VT
12.0%

Healthcare

VIOG
14.6%
VT
8.1%

Financial Services

VIOG
13.7%
VT
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VIOG
10.9%
VT
9.5%

Real Estate

VIOG
6.6%
VT
2.4%

Energy

VIOG
4.1%
VT
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

VIOG
3.3%
VT
4.8%

Basic Materials

VIOG
3.1%
VT
4.2%

Communication Services

VIOG
2.7%
VT
8.3%

Utilities

VIOG
1.7%
VT
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIOG vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIOG
VIOG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VIOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIOG vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIOGVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.42

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.04

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

13.53

-3.52

VIOG vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIOG and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIOGVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

2.31

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.69

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.74

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.44

+0.16

Drawdowns

VIOG vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIOG drawdown since its inception was -41.73%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOG and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIOGVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.73%

-50.27%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-9.67%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.35%

-16.51%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-26.38%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.73%

-34.24%

-7.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-0.88%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-7.02%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.17%

+0.47%

Volatility

VIOG vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (VIOG) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that VIOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIOGVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

3.83%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

10.17%

+2.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

12.70%

+4.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

16.05%

+5.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

17.23%

+5.61%

VIOG vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIOG vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VIOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIOG
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
0.84%1.04%1.03%1.15%1.17%0.69%0.68%1.09%0.76%0.87%0.92%1.04%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIOG and VT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIOG has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOG dropped -41.73% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.74% vs 10.83% for VIOG. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VIOG.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.84% for VIOG.

VIOG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VT is Global Equities. VIOG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VIOG and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIOG and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer