VT vs. SPY
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 13.20%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
VT vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 13.20%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 29.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
VT vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.36% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and SPY is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VT and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VT vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VT
SPY
Financial Services
VT
SPY
Industrials
VT
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
VT
SPY
Communication Services
VT
SPY
Healthcare
VT
SPY
Consumer Defensive
VT
SPY
Basic Materials
VT
SPY
Energy
VT
SPY
Utilities
VT
SPY
Real Estate
VT
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
VT
SPY
VT vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.39 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 3.01 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.35 | 13.54 | -0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -55.19% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -8.88% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -18.76% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -24.50% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -33.72% | -0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -1.75% | +0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -9.04% | +2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.97% | +0.25% |
Volatility
VT vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 4.64% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.12% | 9.75% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.44% | 12.43% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 17.14% | -0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 17.99% | -0.72% |
VT vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VT vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VT and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VT has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 13.20% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 13.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPY.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.09% for SPY.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer