PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIG vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIG vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has outperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 13.23%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.


VIG

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.79%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.99%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
13.23%

GCOW

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.09%
YTD
12.18%
6M
13.23%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIG vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.57%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
12.18%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%17.81%-7.99%20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and GCOW is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.68

The correlation between VIG and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VIG vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIG
GCOW

Technology

26.2%
0.9%

Financial Services

20.6%

-

Healthcare

16.5%
14.6%

Industrials

11.8%
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
4.6%

Energy

3.5%
24.4%

Basic Materials

3.5%
7.3%

Utilities

3.2%
4.1%

Communication Services

0.5%
14.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

VIG
26.2%
GCOW
0.9%

Financial Services

VIG
20.6%
GCOW

-

Healthcare

VIG
16.5%
GCOW
14.6%

Industrials

VIG
11.8%
GCOW
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

VIG
10.1%
GCOW
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VIG
4.7%
GCOW
4.6%

Energy

VIG
3.5%
GCOW
24.4%

Basic Materials

VIG
3.5%
GCOW
7.3%

Utilities

VIG
3.2%
GCOW
4.1%

Communication Services

VIG
0.5%
GCOW
14.6%

Real Estate

VIG

-

GCOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIG vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIG vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIGGCOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

5.71

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

15.05

-4.98

VIG vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIGGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.52

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.92

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.61

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.59

+0.01

Drawdowns

VIG vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and GCOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-37.64%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-4.77%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-12.35%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-21.48%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

-37.64%

+5.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-2.73%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-5.84%

+0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.81%

+0.15%

Volatility

VIG vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.19%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

2.85%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.57%

7.99%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.01%

10.81%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

13.49%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

16.20%

-0.15%

VIG vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIG vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.43%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%0.00%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIG and GCOW have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCOW has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to VIG (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.23% vs 9.91% for GCOW. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.23% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.

VIG is categorized as Dividend, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.60% for GCOW.

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIG and GCOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer