PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIG vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIG vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIG achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 18.62% return. Over the past 10 years, VIG has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 12.98%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.08% annualized return.


VIG

1D
0.41%
1M
0.64%
6M
7.02%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
19.59%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
10.56%
10Y*
12.98%
ALL TIME*
10.24%

FDL

1D
0.39%
1M
3.67%
6M
9.83%
YTD
18.62%
1Y
28.15%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.10%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.38M$49.50M$43.21M
$232.65M$242.03M$260.72M

VIG vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
10.16%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.62%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VIG and FDL is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between VIG and FDL has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VIG vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIG
FDL

Technology

26.9%
4.3%

Financial Services

20.3%
13.7%

Healthcare

17.8%
11.7%

Industrials

11.9%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
4.4%

Basic Materials

3.4%
0.4%

Utilities

3.0%
15.4%

Energy

3.0%
11.1%

Communication Services

0.5%
11.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

VIG
26.9%
FDL
4.3%

Financial Services

VIG
20.3%
FDL
13.7%

Healthcare

VIG
17.8%
FDL
11.7%

Industrials

VIG
11.9%
FDL
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

VIG
9.2%
FDL
24.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VIG
4.5%
FDL
4.4%

Basic Materials

VIG
3.4%
FDL
0.4%

Utilities

VIG
3.0%
FDL
15.4%

Energy

VIG
3.0%
FDL
11.1%

Communication Services

VIG
0.5%
FDL
11.2%

Real Estate

VIG

-

FDL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIG vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VIG vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VIGFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

6.62

-4.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

15.62

-5.50

VIG vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIG and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VIG vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIG drawdown since its inception was -46.81%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIG and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.81%

-65.93%

+19.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-4.27%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-12.24%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

-16.46%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

-41.40%

+9.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.58%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-9.59%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.81%

+0.13%

Volatility

VIG vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is 2.57%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that VIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

4.65%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.62%

8.75%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.08%

11.89%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.20%

14.44%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

17.16%

-1.14%

VIG vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIG vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

VIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than FDL's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.58%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.49%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIG and FDL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to VIG (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIG dropped -46.81% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 12.98% vs 11.08% for FDL. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.49% for VIG.

VIG is categorized as Dividend, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VIG and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIG and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer