VGT vs. VYM
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 24.81%/yr vs 11.65%/yr for VYM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
VGT vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 22.48% return, which is significantly higher than VYM's 10.90% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 24.81%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.65% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 22.48%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 49.26%
- 3Y*
- 30.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.48%
- 10Y*
- 24.81%
VYM
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 25.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
VGT vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 22.48% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 10.90% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and VYM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VGT and VYM has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VGT vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
VYM
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VGT
VYM
Communication Services
VGT
VYM
Financial Services
VGT
VYM
Industrials
VGT
VYM
Energy
VGT
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
VYM
Basic Materials
VGT
VYM
Healthcare
VGT
VYM
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
VYM
Real Estate
VGT
-
VYM
Utilities
VGT
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
VYM
VGT vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGT | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.44 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.78 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | 14.19 | -4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGT | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.45 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.80 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | 0.72 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.51 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
VGT vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -56.98% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -6.69% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -14.46% | -12.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -15.84% | -19.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -35.21% | +0.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.34% | -1.82% | -6.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -7.19% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | 1.78% | +3.37% |
Volatility
VGT vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.08%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.29% | 3.08% | +6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.37% | 7.73% | +9.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 10.35% | +11.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.31% | 13.97% | +11.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 16.34% | +8.34% |
VGT vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGT vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than VYM's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.22% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and VYM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to VYM (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.81% vs 11.65% for VYM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.81% return vs 11.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while VYM is Dividend. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer