VGT vs. GXPT
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - VGT tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
VGT vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 23.92% return, which is significantly higher than GXPT's 18.77% return.
VGT
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- 6M
- 23.67%
- YTD
- 23.92%
- 1Y
- 38.47%
- 3Y*
- 28.34%
- 5Y*
- 19.08%
- 10Y*
- 24.77%
GXPT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 20.25%
- YTD
- 18.77%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 23.92% | 11.12% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 18.77% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and GXPT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGT vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -18.74% | -35.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.26% | -7.22% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.94% | -5.24% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | — | — |
Volatility
VGT vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.36% | 22.92% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 22.92% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.80% | 22.92% | +1.88% |
VGT vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGT vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than GXPT's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.22% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, VGT and GXPT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPT.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.22% for GXPT.
VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for VGT and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer