PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPT vs. GGTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPT vs. GGTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GXPT having a 17.60% return and GGTL slightly lower at 17.10%.


GXPT

1D
1.42%
1M
1.35%
6M
19.51%
YTD
17.60%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
30.08%

GGTL

1D
2.19%
1M
-4.36%
6M
15.01%
YTD
17.10%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$245.95K$123.28K$50.77K
$16.90M$9.50M$5.80M

GXPT vs. GGTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPT and GGTL is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.77

The correlation between GXPT and GGTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPT vs. GGTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GXPT
GXPT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GXPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXPT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GXPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GGTL
GGTL Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGTL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GGTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGTL Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GXPT vs. GGTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXPTGGTLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.24

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.54

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

6.97

-2.62

GXPT vs. GGTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXPT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the GGTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXPT and GGTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPT vs. GGTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPT drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum GGTL drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPT and GGTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPTGGTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-23.65%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.74%

-17.86%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.14%

-9.83%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-7.41%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.13%

3.94%

+3.19%

Volatility

GXPT vs. GGTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT) is 7.76%, while Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that GXPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPTGGTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

11.32%

-3.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.32%

20.41%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.53%

22.49%

+1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.28%

18.85%

+4.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.28%

18.85%

+4.43%

GXPT vs. GGTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GGTL's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPT vs. GGTL - Dividend Comparison

GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than GGTL's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GGTL
Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF
0.89%1.04%0.75%0.84%0.78%
GXPT
Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF
0.22%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXPT and GGTL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GGTL has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to GXPT (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXPT dropped -18.74% vs GGTL's -23.65%.

On 1-year performance, GXPT leads with 30.95% vs 27.43% for GGTL. On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GXPT has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GXPT has performed better with a 30.95% return vs 27.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GGTL.

GGTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.22% for GXPT.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPT and 0.90% for GGTL.

GXPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPT and GGTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer