VFVA vs. FVD
VFVA (Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF) and FVD (First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. VFVA is actively managed, while FVD is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFVA returned 9.48%/yr vs 5.20%/yr for FVD. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFVA charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FVD.
Performance
VFVA vs. FVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 2.21% return.
VFVA
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 9.50%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 28.50%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- —
FVD
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.80%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
VFVA vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 9.50% | 14.77% | 7.67% | 17.37% | -3.96% | 36.94% | 2.28% | 25.42% | -15.61% |
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.21% | 8.16% | 10.04% | 4.11% | -5.18% | 25.08% | -0.02% | 26.58% | -2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFVA and FVD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.80 |
The correlation between VFVA and FVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
VFVA vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFVA
FVD
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VFVA
FVD
Healthcare
VFVA
FVD
Technology
VFVA
FVD
Consumer Cyclical
VFVA
FVD
Industrials
VFVA
FVD
Energy
VFVA
FVD
Consumer Defensive
VFVA
FVD
Communication Services
VFVA
FVD
Basic Materials
VFVA
FVD
Real Estate
VFVA
FVD
Utilities
VFVA
-
FVD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFVA vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank
VFVA
FVD
VFVA vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFVA | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 0.72 | +1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 1.12 | +1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.13 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 0.95 | +2.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.61 | 2.58 | +8.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFVA | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 0.72 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.41 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.58 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
VFVA vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, roughly equal to the maximum FVD drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and FVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFVA | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.58% | -51.00% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -7.23% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.07% | -11.97% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.07% | -16.41% | -7.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -5.96% | +4.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -5.44% | -1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.66% | +0.03% |
Volatility
VFVA vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) at 2.62%. This indicates that VFVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFVA | FVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 2.62% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 6.73% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 9.50% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 12.76% | +7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.32% | 15.44% | +8.88% |
VFVA vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFVA vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison
VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than FVD's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVD First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund | 2.31% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.31% | 2.03% | 2.50% | 2.10% | 2.04% | 2.34% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.95% | 2.13% | 2.40% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFVA and FVD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFVA has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to FVD (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFVA dropped -48.58% vs FVD's -51.00%.
On 5-year performance, VFVA leads with 9.48% vs 5.20% for FVD. On fees, VFVA is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFVA has performed better with a 9.48% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFVA is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FVD.
FVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.95% for VFVA.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFVA and 0.61% for FVD.
VFVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFVA and FVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer