VFVA vs. SPY
VFVA (Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFVA is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. VFVA is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFVA returned 12.45%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for SPY. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VFVA charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
VFVA vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 19.47% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.13% return.
VFVA
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- YTD
- 19.47%
- 1Y
- 37.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.75%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.27B | $35.99B | $39.23B | |
| $2.76M | $2.45M | $1.67M |
VFVA vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 19.47% | 14.77% | 7.67% | 17.37% | -3.96% | 36.94% | 2.28% | 25.42% | -18.90% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.13% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFVA and SPY is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VFVA and SPY has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VFVA vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFVA
SPY
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VFVA
SPY
Healthcare
VFVA
SPY
Technology
VFVA
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
VFVA
SPY
Industrials
VFVA
SPY
Energy
VFVA
SPY
Consumer Defensive
VFVA
SPY
Communication Services
VFVA
SPY
Basic Materials
VFVA
SPY
Real Estate
VFVA
SPY
Utilities
VFVA
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFVA vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
VFVA
SPY
VFVA vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFVA | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 2.20 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.15 | 9.40 | +4.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFVA vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFVA | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.58% | -55.19% | +6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -8.88% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.07% | -18.76% | -5.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.07% | -24.50% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -1.40% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -9.01% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 2.08% | +0.44% |
Volatility
VFVA vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.58%. This indicates that VFVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFVA | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 3.58% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 10.14% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 12.89% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.05% | 17.18% | +2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.20% | 17.95% | +6.25% |
VFVA vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFVA vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.77% | 2.13% | 2.40% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFVA and SPY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFVA has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to SPY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFVA dropped -48.58% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 12.76% vs 12.45% for VFVA. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 12.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFVA.
VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
VFVA is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFVA and 0.09% for SPY.
VFVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFVA and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer