PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFVA vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFVA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return.


VFVA

1D
-0.19%
1M
1.33%
YTD
10.97%
6M
13.44%
1Y
32.32%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFVA vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
10.97%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%36.94%2.28%25.42%-15.61%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between VFVA and VOO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.74

The correlation between VFVA and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFVA vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFVA
VOO

Financial Services

25.7%
11.6%

Healthcare

14.9%
8.5%

Technology

14.5%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
10.2%

Industrials

7.6%
8.3%

Energy

7.3%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
4.9%

Communication Services

6.2%
11.3%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Financial Services

VFVA
25.7%
VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

VFVA
14.9%
VOO
8.5%

Technology

VFVA
14.5%
VOO
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VFVA
13.1%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

VFVA
7.6%
VOO
8.3%

Energy

VFVA
7.3%
VOO
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

VFVA
7.1%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

VFVA
6.2%
VOO
11.3%

Basic Materials

VFVA
3.3%
VOO
1.8%

Real Estate

VFVA
0.4%
VOO
1.9%

Utilities

VFVA

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFVA vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFVA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFVAVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

2.53

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

3.43

-0.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.73

3.42

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.86

15.95

-4.09

VFVA vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFVA and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFVAVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.53

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.85

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.89

-0.46

Drawdowns

VFVA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFVAVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.58%

-33.99%

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-8.90%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.07%

-18.69%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-24.52%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-3.69%

-3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

1.91%

+0.78%

Volatility

VFVA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that VFVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFVAVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

2.74%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.71%

8.88%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.29%

11.78%

+3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.17%

16.81%

+3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.32%

18.01%

+6.31%

VFVA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFVA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.93%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFVA and VOO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFVA has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFVA dropped -48.58% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 14.26% vs 9.83% for VFVA. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFVA.

VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

VFVA is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFVA and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFVA and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer