VFVA vs. VOO
VFVA (Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFVA is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. VFVA is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFVA returned 9.83%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for VOO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFVA charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
VFVA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return.
VFVA
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 6M
- 13.44%
- 1Y
- 32.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.83%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.69%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 29.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
VFVA vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 10.97% | 14.77% | 7.67% | 17.37% | -3.96% | 36.94% | 2.28% | 25.42% | -15.61% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 11.69% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFVA and VOO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.74 |
The correlation between VFVA and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFVA vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFVA
VOO
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VFVA
VOO
Healthcare
VFVA
VOO
Technology
VFVA
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
VFVA
VOO
Industrials
VFVA
VOO
Energy
VFVA
VOO
Consumer Defensive
VFVA
VOO
Communication Services
VFVA
VOO
Basic Materials
VFVA
VOO
Real Estate
VFVA
VOO
Utilities
VFVA
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFVA vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
VFVA
VOO
VFVA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFVA | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 2.53 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 3.43 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.46 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 3.42 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.86 | 15.95 | -4.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFVA | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.53 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.85 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.89 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
VFVA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFVA | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.58% | -33.99% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -8.90% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.07% | -18.69% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.07% | -24.52% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | 0.00% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.31% | -3.69% | -3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 1.91% | +0.78% |
Volatility
VFVA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that VFVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFVA | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 2.74% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 8.88% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.29% | 11.78% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 16.81% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.32% | 18.01% | +6.31% |
VFVA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFVA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.93% | 2.13% | 2.40% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFVA and VOO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFVA has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFVA dropped -48.58% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 14.26% vs 9.83% for VFVA. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFVA.
VFVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.
VFVA is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFVA and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFVA and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer