VFH vs. VOE
VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) and VOE (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VOE is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VFH returned 13.15%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for VOE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VFH charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOE.
Performance
VFH vs. VOE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly lower than VOE's 12.81% return. Over the past 10 years, VFH has outperformed VOE with an annualized return of 13.15%, while VOE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.92% annualized return.
VFH
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
VOE
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 11.83%
- 1Y
- 24.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
VFH vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -1.58% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 12.81% | 12.08% | 14.00% | 9.85% | -7.97% | 28.78% | 2.65% | 27.85% | -12.48% | 17.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFH and VOE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006 | 0.87 |
The correlation between VFH and VOE shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFH vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFH
VOE
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VFH
VOE
Technology
VFH
VOE
Real Estate
VFH
VOE
Industrials
VFH
VOE
Healthcare
VFH
VOE
Communication Services
VFH
VOE
Consumer Cyclical
VFH
VOE
Basic Materials
VFH
-
VOE
Consumer Defensive
VFH
-
VOE
Energy
VFH
-
VOE
Utilities
VFH
-
VOE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFH vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank
VFH
VOE
VFH vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFH | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 3.52 | -3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.35 | 13.34 | -11.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFH vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than VOE's maximum drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and VOE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFH | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.61% | -61.50% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -6.93% | -7.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.30% | -18.45% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -19.70% | -5.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.42% | -43.18% | -1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.57% | 0.00% | -4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -8.34% | -10.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.65% | 1.83% | +3.82% |
Volatility
VFH vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 3.19%. This indicates that VFH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFH | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 3.19% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 8.30% | +3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 11.63% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 16.06% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 18.83% | +3.72% |
VFH vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFH vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison
VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than VOE's 1.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.48% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.84% | 2.10% | 2.11% | 2.27% | 2.27% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFH and VOE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFH has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to VOE (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs VOE's -61.50%.
On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 13.15% vs 10.92% for VOE. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 13.15% return vs 10.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VFH.
VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.48% for VFH.
VFH is categorized as Financials Equities, while VOE is Mid Cap Value Equities. VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFH and 0.05% for VOE.
VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFH and VOE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer