VFH vs. VIS
VFH (Vanguard Financials ETF) and VIS (Vanguard Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFH is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VIS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VFH returned 13.15%/yr vs 14.22%/yr for VIS. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
VFH vs. VIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 15.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VFH has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 13.15%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.
VFH
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 4.53%
- YTD
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 9.92%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
VIS
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 15.65%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 28.67%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
VFH vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -1.58% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -13.52% | 19.99% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 15.65% | 18.57% | 16.85% | 22.50% | -8.57% | 20.80% | 12.34% | 30.09% | -14.01% | 21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFH and VIS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004 | 0.80 |
The correlation between VFH and VIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFH vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFH
VIS
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VFH
VIS
Technology
VFH
VIS
Real Estate
VFH
VIS
Industrials
VFH
VIS
Healthcare
VFH
VIS
Communication Services
VFH
VIS
Consumer Cyclical
VFH
VIS
Basic Materials
VFH
-
VIS
Consumer Defensive
VFH
-
VIS
-
Energy
VFH
-
VIS
Utilities
VFH
-
VIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFH vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank
VFH
VIS
VFH vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFH | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.27 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 2.24 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.35 | 9.28 | -7.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFH vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than VIS's maximum drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and VIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFH | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.61% | -63.51% | -15.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -12.29% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.30% | -20.80% | +3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -22.96% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.42% | -42.42% | -2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.57% | -0.34% | -4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -8.37% | -10.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.65% | 2.97% | +2.68% |
Volatility
VFH vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 4.33%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFH | VIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 6.71% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 14.28% | -2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.06% | 17.20% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 18.48% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 20.48% | +2.07% |
VFH vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VFH and VIS have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFH vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison
VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than VIS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.48% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
VIS Vanguard Industrials ETF | 0.88% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 1.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFH and VIS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VIS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to VFH (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs VIS's -63.51%.
On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.22% vs 13.15% for VFH. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFH and VIS have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.88% for VIS.
VFH is categorized as Financials Equities, while VIS is Industrials Equities. VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index.
VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFH and VIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer