PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFH vs. VIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFH vs. VIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 15.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VFH has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 13.15%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.


VFH

1D
1.34%
1M
4.53%
YTD
-1.58%
6M
-1.74%
1Y
9.92%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
9.36%
10Y*
13.15%

VIS

1D
0.51%
1M
2.91%
YTD
15.65%
6M
14.50%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
14.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFH vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-1.58%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
15.65%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and VIS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004

0.80

The correlation between VFH and VIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFH vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFH
VIS

Financial Services

96.8%
0.2%

Technology

2.1%
4.5%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.0%

Industrials

0.2%
89.4%

Healthcare

0.1%
0.0%

Communication Services

0.0%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
1.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

4.3%

Financial Services

VFH
96.8%
VIS
0.2%

Technology

VFH
2.1%
VIS
4.5%

Real Estate

VFH
0.8%
VIS
0.0%

Industrials

VFH
0.2%
VIS
89.4%

Healthcare

VFH
0.1%
VIS
0.0%

Communication Services

VFH
0.0%
VIS
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VFH
0.0%
VIS
1.1%

Basic Materials

VFH

-

VIS
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

VFH

-

VIS

-

Energy

VFH

-

VIS
0.1%

Utilities

VFH

-

VIS
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFH vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFH vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFHVISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

2.24

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

9.28

-7.93

VFH vs. VIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the VIS Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and VIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFH vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than VIS's maximum drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and VIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFHVISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.61%

-63.51%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-12.29%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-20.80%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-22.96%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

-42.42%

-2.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.57%

-0.34%

-4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-8.37%

-10.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.65%

2.97%

+2.68%

Volatility

VFH vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 4.33%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFHVISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

6.71%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

14.28%

-2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

17.20%

-2.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

18.48%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.55%

20.48%

+2.07%

VFH vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFH and VIS have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFH vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than VIS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.48%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.88%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFH and VIS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to VFH (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs VIS's -63.51%.

On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.22% vs 13.15% for VFH. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFH and VIS have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

VFH has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.88% for VIS.

VFH is categorized as Financials Equities, while VIS is Industrials Equities. VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index.

VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFH and VIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer