PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFH vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFH vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -4.26% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, VFH has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 12.59%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.


VFH

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.01%
YTD
-4.26%
6M
-1.64%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
12.59%

VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFH vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
-4.26%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VFH and VEA is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between VFH and VEA has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VFH vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFH
VEA

Financial Services

96.8%
23.3%

Technology

2.1%
13.8%

Real Estate

0.8%
2.7%

Industrials

0.2%
19.2%

Healthcare

0.1%
8.2%

Communication Services

0.0%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
7.5%

Basic Materials

-

7.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Energy

-

5.4%

Utilities

-

3.3%

Financial Services

VFH
96.8%
VEA
23.3%

Technology

VFH
2.1%
VEA
13.8%

Real Estate

VFH
0.8%
VEA
2.7%

Industrials

VFH
0.2%
VEA
19.2%

Healthcare

VFH
0.1%
VEA
8.2%

Communication Services

VFH
0.0%
VEA
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VFH
0.0%
VEA
7.5%

Basic Materials

VFH

-

VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

VFH

-

VEA
5.6%

Energy

VFH

-

VEA
5.4%

Utilities

VFH

-

VEA
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFH vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFH vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFHVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.32

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

2.42

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

9.39

-8.64

VFH vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFH Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFH and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFHVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

1.75

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.55

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.59

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.24

+0.01

Drawdowns

VFH vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFHVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.61%

-60.68%

-17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.75%

-11.63%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.30%

-13.45%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-29.71%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.42%

-35.73%

-8.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.17%

-3.40%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-13.29%

-5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

3.00%

+2.60%

Volatility

VFH vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 4.28%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFHVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

6.03%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

13.91%

-2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

16.15%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

16.63%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.56%

17.40%

+5.16%

VFH vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFH has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFH vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than VEA's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.53%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFH and VEA have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to VFH (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFH dropped -78.61% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VFH leads with 12.59% vs 10.14% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VFH has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VFH has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VFH.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.53% for VFH.

VFH is categorized as Financials Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VFH tracks MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VFH and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFH and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer