PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFFVX vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFFVX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFFVX achieves a 9.69% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VFFVX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 11.89%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


VFFVX

1D
2.20%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
9.69%
6M
10.45%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
18.38%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
11.89%

VGT

1D
0.58%
1M
1.35%
YTD
24.03%
6M
24.13%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
20.35%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFFVX vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFFVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund
9.69%21.44%14.50%20.39%-17.48%16.44%16.33%24.98%-7.88%21.39%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VFFVX and VGT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2010

0.85

The correlation between VFFVX and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFFVX vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFFVX
VGT

Technology

27.3%
98.5%

Financial Services

16.1%
0.5%

Industrials

12.4%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
0.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
0.0%

Communication Services

8.0%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Energy

4.3%
0.3%

Basic Materials

4.3%
0.0%

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.5%

-

Technology

VFFVX
27.3%
VGT
98.5%

Financial Services

VFFVX
16.1%
VGT
0.5%

Industrials

VFFVX
12.4%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VFFVX
9.4%
VGT
0.1%

Healthcare

VFFVX
8.3%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

VFFVX
8.0%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

VFFVX
4.8%
VGT

-

Energy

VFFVX
4.3%
VGT
0.3%

Basic Materials

VFFVX
4.3%
VGT
0.0%

Utilities

VFFVX
2.7%
VGT

-

Real Estate

VFFVX
2.5%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFFVX vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFFVX
VFFVX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VFFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VFFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFFVX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFFVXVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.94

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

9.11

+2.56

VFFVX vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFFVX and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFFVX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFFVX drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFFVX and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFFVXVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-54.63%

+23.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-16.40%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-27.23%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-35.07%

+9.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

-35.07%

+3.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.21%

-7.18%

+4.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-7.95%

+3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

5.28%

-3.22%

Volatility

VFFVX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) is 4.84%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that VFFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFFVXVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

10.00%

-5.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

18.00%

-8.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

22.00%

-9.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.29%

25.40%

-11.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

24.72%

-9.58%

VFFVX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFFVX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VFFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFFVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund
1.90%2.08%2.31%2.18%2.19%10.03%1.82%2.15%2.35%1.83%1.99%1.98%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFFVX and VGT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to VFFVX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFFVX dropped -31.40% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFFVX and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer