PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFFVX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFFVX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFFVX achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.45% return. Over the past 10 years, VFFVX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.86%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.23% annualized return.


VFFVX

1D
0.29%
1M
2.03%
YTD
11.68%
6M
12.27%
1Y
26.83%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
11.86%

VOO

1D
-2.59%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.18%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
13.39%
10Y*
15.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFFVX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFFVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund
11.68%21.44%14.50%20.39%-17.48%16.44%16.33%24.98%-7.88%21.39%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.45%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VFFVX and VOO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.96

The correlation between VFFVX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFFVX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFFVX
VOO

Technology

27.3%
35.7%

Financial Services

16.1%
11.6%

Industrials

12.4%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.2%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.5%

Communication Services

8.0%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.9%

Energy

4.3%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.3%
1.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.5%
1.9%

Technology

VFFVX
27.3%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

VFFVX
16.1%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

VFFVX
12.4%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VFFVX
9.4%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

VFFVX
8.3%
VOO
8.5%

Communication Services

VFFVX
8.0%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

VFFVX
4.8%
VOO
4.9%

Energy

VFFVX
4.3%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

VFFVX
4.3%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

VFFVX
2.7%
VOO
2.4%

Real Estate

VFFVX
2.5%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFFVX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFFVX
VFFVX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VFFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VFFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFFVX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFFVXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.39

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.92

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

13.53

+0.13

VFFVX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFFVX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFFVXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.15

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.80

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.85

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.88

-0.11

Drawdowns

VFFVX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFFVX drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFFVX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFFVXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-33.99%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-8.90%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-18.69%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-24.52%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

-33.99%

+2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-2.90%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-3.69%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.92%

+0.09%

Volatility

VFFVX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) is 3.38%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that VFFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFFVXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.74%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

9.30%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.44%

12.10%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

16.84%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.10%

18.02%

-2.92%

VFFVX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFFVX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VFFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFFVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund
1.86%2.08%2.31%2.18%2.19%10.03%1.82%2.15%2.35%1.83%1.99%1.98%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VFFVX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to VFFVX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFFVX dropped -31.40% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VFFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFFVX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer