PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFFVX vs. VGPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFFVX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFFVX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 14.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VFFVX has outperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 11.49%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.80% annualized return.


VFFVX

1D
-2.80%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
8.56%
6M
9.42%
1Y
23.27%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
11.49%

VGPMX

1D
-4.16%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
14.15%
6M
19.93%
1Y
54.88%
3Y*
28.92%
5Y*
18.90%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFFVX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VFFVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund
8.56%21.44%14.50%20.39%-17.48%16.44%16.33%24.98%-7.88%21.39%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
14.15%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%20.67%-32.26%13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VFFVX and VGPMX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2010

0.62

The correlation between VFFVX and VGPMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.78 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VFFVX vs. VGPMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFFVX
VGPMX

Technology

27.3%
9.5%

Financial Services

16.1%
5.7%

Industrials

12.4%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
5.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
11.9%

Communication Services

8.0%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
9.4%

Energy

4.3%
4.4%

Basic Materials

4.3%
38.0%

Utilities

2.7%
4.7%

Real Estate

2.5%
2.2%

Technology

VFFVX
27.3%
VGPMX
9.5%

Financial Services

VFFVX
16.1%
VGPMX
5.7%

Industrials

VFFVX
12.4%
VGPMX
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VFFVX
9.4%
VGPMX
5.1%

Healthcare

VFFVX
8.3%
VGPMX
11.9%

Communication Services

VFFVX
8.0%
VGPMX
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

VFFVX
4.8%
VGPMX
9.4%

Energy

VFFVX
4.3%
VGPMX
4.4%

Basic Materials

VFFVX
4.3%
VGPMX
38.0%

Utilities

VFFVX
2.7%
VGPMX
4.7%

Real Estate

VFFVX
2.5%
VGPMX
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFFVX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFFVX
VFFVX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VFFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VFFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFFVX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFFVXVGPMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.55

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

4.33

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.96

17.90

-5.94

VFFVX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFFVX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFFVXVGPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

3.19

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.09

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.52

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.26

+0.49

Drawdowns

VFFVX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFFVX drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFFVX and VGPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFFVXVGPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.40%

-78.85%

+47.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-12.80%

+3.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-14.63%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.39%

-22.71%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

-54.59%

+23.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.22%

-5.77%

+2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-34.55%

+30.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

3.09%

-1.07%

Volatility

VFFVX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) is 4.17%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that VFFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFFVXVGPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

6.90%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

14.59%

-5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

17.35%

-5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.23%

17.48%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.12%

20.91%

-5.79%

VFFVX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFFVX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

VFFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than VGPMX's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFFVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund
1.92%2.08%2.31%2.18%2.19%10.03%1.82%2.15%2.35%1.83%1.99%1.98%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.42%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFFVX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGPMX has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to VFFVX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFFVX dropped -31.40% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFFVX and VGPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer