PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
VGPMX vs. GLTR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


VGPMXGLTR
YTD Return9.31%22.56%
1Y Return18.49%30.77%
3Y Return (Ann)8.97%5.76%
5Y Return (Ann)13.84%8.95%
10Y Return (Ann)5.94%6.13%
Sharpe Ratio1.221.70
Sortino Ratio1.702.32
Omega Ratio1.211.29
Calmar Ratio0.371.18
Martin Ratio6.119.04
Ulcer Index2.98%3.51%
Daily Std Dev14.87%18.69%
Max Drawdown-79.32%-55.70%
Current Drawdown-39.93%-8.39%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between VGPMX and GLTR is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

VGPMX vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, VGPMX achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly lower than GLTR's 22.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VGPMX having a 5.94% annualized return and GLTR not far ahead at 6.13%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.82%
5.79%
VGPMX
GLTR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VGPMX vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGPMX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.


GLTR
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF
Expense ratio chart for GLTR: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%
Expense ratio chart for VGPMX: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

VGPMX vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGPMX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VGPMX, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VGPMX, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VGPMX, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VGPMX, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VGPMX, currently valued at 6.11, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.11
GLTR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.70
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.32
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GLTR, currently valued at 9.04, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.04

VGPMX vs. GLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGPMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the GLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGPMX and GLTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.22
1.70
VGPMX
GLTR

Dividends

VGPMX vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

VGPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.13%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.01%0.02%1.71%2.33%0.00%0.08%
GLTR
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VGPMX vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGPMX drawdown since its inception was -79.32%, which is greater than GLTR's maximum drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGPMX and GLTR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-34.19%
-8.39%
VGPMX
GLTR

Volatility

VGPMX vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) is 4.72%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that VGPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.72%
6.59%
VGPMX
GLTR