VFFVX vs. CGMU

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VFFVX (Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund) and CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) are both funds - VFFVX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Vanguard, while CGMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past 3 years, VFFVX returned 18.33%/yr vs 4.67%/yr for CGMU. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFFVX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for CGMU.

Performance

VFFVX vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFFVX achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than CGMU's 1.46% return.

VFFVX

• 1D: -2.80%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 6M: 9.42%
• 1Y: 23.27%
• 3Y*: 18.33%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: 11.49%

CGMU

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 6.88%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFFVX vs. CGMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
VFFVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund	8.56%	21.44%	14.50%	20.39%	3.82%
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	1.46%	5.19%	2.64%	6.76%	4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VFFVX and CGMU is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022	0.20

Return for Risk

VFFVX vs. CGMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFFVX

VFFVX Risk / Return Rank: 53
VFFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
VFFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
VFFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
VFFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
VFFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

CGMU

CGMU Risk / Return Rank: 79
CGMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CGMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CGMU Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CGMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CGMU Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFFVX vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VFFVX	CGMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	3.02	-0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	4.31	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.65	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	2.71	0.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.96	8.76	+3.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VFFVX vs. CGMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is lower than the CGMU Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFFVX and CGMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VFFVX	CGMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.05	3.02	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	1.66	-0.91

Drawdowns

VFFVX vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFFVX drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFFVX and CGMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFFVX	CGMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.40%	-4.11%	-27.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-2.55%	-6.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.52%	-3.89%	-10.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.22%	-0.82%	-2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.14%	-0.84%	-3.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	0.79%	+1.23%

Volatility

VFFVX vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund (VFFVX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) at 0.82%. This indicates that VFFVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFFVX	CGMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	0.82%	+3.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.56%	1.74%	+7.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.80%	2.29%	+9.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.23%	3.47%	+10.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.12%	3.47%	+11.65%

VFFVX vs. CGMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFFVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CGMU's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VFFVX vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison

VFFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than CGMU's 3.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	3.33%	3.32%	3.21%	3.08%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VFFVX Vanguard Target Retirement 2055 Fund	1.92%	2.08%	2.31%	2.18%	2.19%	10.03%	1.82%	2.15%	2.35%	1.83%	1.99%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFFVX and CGMU in my portfolio?

VFFVX and CGMU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VFFVX or CGMU?

VFFVX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to CGMU (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFFVX dropped -31.40% vs CGMU's -4.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.