CGMU vs. FLMI

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) and FLMI (Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CGMU returned 4.74%/yr vs 6.04%/yr for FLMI. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGMU charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FLMI.

Performance

CGMU vs. FLMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMU achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than FLMI's 2.35% return.

CGMU

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 1.50%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 6.84%
• 3Y*: 4.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLMI

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 2.67%
• 1Y: 8.32%
• 3Y*: 6.04%
• 5Y*: 2.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGMU vs. FLMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	1.50%	5.19%	2.64%	6.76%	4.53%
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF	2.35%	5.89%	4.91%	7.89%	4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CGMU and FLMI is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022	0.70

The correlation between CGMU and FLMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CGMU vs. FLMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGMU

CGMU Risk / Return Rank: 75
CGMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CGMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
CGMU Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CGMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CGMU Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FLMI

FLMI Risk / Return Rank: 75
FLMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FLMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FLMI Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FLMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FLMI Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGMU vs. FLMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGMU	FLMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	2.70	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	4.08	+0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.61	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	2.82	-0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.61	10.17	-1.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGMU vs. FLMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGMU Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the FLMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMU and FLMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGMU	FLMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00	2.70	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.67	0.65	+1.02

Drawdowns

CGMU vs. FLMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMU drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum FLMI drawdown of -14.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMU and FLMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGMU	FLMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-14.66%	+10.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.55%	-2.90%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.89%	-5.31%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-0.29%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-2.82%	+1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.78%	0.80%	-0.02%

Volatility

CGMU vs. FLMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) is 0.78%, while Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF (FLMI) has a volatility of 1.01%. This indicates that CGMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CGMU	FLMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	1.01%	-0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.72%	2.04%	-0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29%	3.10%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.48%	4.45%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.48%	4.72%	-1.24%

CGMU vs. FLMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMU has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than FLMI's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CGMU vs. FLMI - Dividend Comparison

CGMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than FLMI's 3.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	3.33%	3.32%	3.21%	3.08%	0.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLMI Franklin Liberty Federal Intermediate Tax-Free Bond Opportunities ETF	3.87%	3.89%	4.08%	3.71%	3.08%	2.22%	2.09%	2.71%	2.41%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CGMU and FLMI in my portfolio?

CGMU and FLMI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CGMU or FLMI?

FLMI has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to CGMU (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CGMU dropped -4.11% vs FLMI's -14.66%.

Which ETF is better, CGMU or FLMI?

On 3-year performance, FLMI leads with 6.04% vs 4.74% for CGMU. On fees, CGMU is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, CGMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CGMU or FLMI?

Over the 3-year period, FLMI has performed better with a 6.04% return vs 4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CGMU or FLMI?

CGMU is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FLMI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CGMU or FLMI?

FLMI has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 3.33% for CGMU.

What is the main difference between CGMU and FLMI?

They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CGMU and 0.30% for FLMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.