PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGMU vs. BND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CGMUBND
YTD Return3.62%4.87%
1Y Return8.63%10.34%
Sharpe Ratio2.281.59
Daily Std Dev3.72%6.34%
Max Drawdown-4.11%-18.84%
Current Drawdown0.00%-6.23%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CGMU and BND is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CGMU vs. BND - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CGMU achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 4.87% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.08%
6.15%
CGMU
BND

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGMU vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMU has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for CGMU: current value at 0.27% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.27%
Expense ratio chart for BND: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGMU vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CGMU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 2.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 3.60, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.60
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 10.44, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.44
BND
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BND, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BND, currently valued at 2.34, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BND, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BND, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.41
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BND, currently valued at 6.39, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.39

CGMU vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CGMU and BND.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.28
1.59
CGMU
BND

Dividends

CGMU vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

CGMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than BND's 3.37% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
3.11%3.08%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.37%3.09%2.60%1.97%2.22%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%2.79%2.78%

Drawdowns

CGMU vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMU drawdown since its inception was -4.11%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMU and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember0
-0.44%
CGMU
BND

Volatility

CGMU vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) is 0.72%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that CGMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.72%
1.15%
CGMU
BND