PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CGMU vs. BND
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CGMU vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.85%
9.76%
CGMU
BND

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGMU achieves a 2.91% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 1.55% return.


CGMU

YTD

2.91%

1M

-0.42%

6M

2.54%

1Y

6.84%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

BND

YTD

1.55%

1M

-1.53%

6M

2.79%

1Y

6.33%

5Y (annualized)

-0.32%

10Y (annualized)

1.40%

Key characteristics


CGMUBND
Sharpe Ratio2.101.25
Sortino Ratio3.071.83
Omega Ratio1.441.22
Calmar Ratio2.960.48
Martin Ratio11.994.20
Ulcer Index0.61%1.70%
Daily Std Dev3.47%5.68%
Max Drawdown-4.10%-18.84%
Current Drawdown-1.00%-9.21%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CGMU vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGMU has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for CGMU: current value at 0.27% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.27%
Expense ratio chart for BND: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CGMU and BND is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CGMU vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 2.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.101.25
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.071.83
The chart of Omega ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.441.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 2.96, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.961.93
The chart of Martin ratio for CGMU, currently valued at 11.99, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0011.994.20
CGMU
BND

The current CGMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGMU and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.10
1.25
CGMU
BND

Dividends

CGMU vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

CGMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than BND's 3.58% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CGMU
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
3.19%3.09%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.58%3.09%2.60%1.97%2.22%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%2.79%2.78%

Drawdowns

CGMU vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGMU drawdown since its inception was -4.10%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGMU and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.00%
-3.59%
CGMU
BND

Volatility

CGMU vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.64%. This indicates that CGMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.96%
1.64%
CGMU
BND